The Open Group · TOGAF-Agile-Specialist
Validates knowledge and understanding of how to adapt and use the TOGAF® framework to support an Agile enterprise. Covers applying the TOGAF ADM using Agile sprints, Agile Enterprise Architecture governance, and Agile Product Management techniques.
Practice Questions
589
≈ 9 practice exams
Duration
60 minutes
Passing Score
60%
Difficulty
SpecialtyLast Updated
Jun 2026
Use this TOGAF-Agile-Specialist practice exam to prepare for The Open Group Certified: TOGAF® Framework Agile Specialist with realistic questions, detailed explanations, and focused study modes. The practice bank includes 589 questions for The Open Group TOGAF-Agile-Specialist, so you can review the exam steadily instead of relying on one long cram session.
As you practice, pay extra attention to recurring topics such as Agility Concepts and Enterprise Architecture, Adapting the TOGAF Standard for Agile Environments, Applying the TOGAF ADM with Agile Sprints, Agile Enterprise Architecture Governance, and Agile Product Management Techniques. Start with short sessions to identify weak areas, then move into timed quizzes once your accuracy is consistent.
The explanations are especially useful when you want to connect exam wording to the responsibilities and scenarios described in the official certification guidance. Use the free preview first, then unlock the full question bank when you are ready to build a complete study routine.
The Open Group Certified: TOGAF® Framework Agile Specialist is a knowledge-based certification credential that validates an Enterprise Architect's ability to adapt and apply the TOGAF® Standard within Agile organizational contexts. It is aligned to The TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition, and focuses specifically on reconciling the structured, phase-based nature of the TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM) with the iterative, sprint-driven practices characteristic of Agile delivery. The credential demonstrates that the holder understands how to reshape the TOGAF framework—including its governance and content metamodel—to support continuous, incremental architecture work rather than traditional waterfall-style engagements.
The certification covers a focused set of competencies: understanding Agile principles in the context of Enterprise Architecture, applying the TOGAF ADM through Agile sprints, implementing Agile EA governance, and leveraging Agile Product Management techniques. It is part of The Open Group's broader TOGAF Certification Portfolio, which includes specialist and leadership credentials that build on the foundational TOGAF Enterprise Architecture qualification. The credential is issued with an Open Badge and a certificate, and it does not expire—remaining tied indefinitely to the specific version of the Body of Knowledge against which it was earned.
This certification is designed for practicing Enterprise Architects who already hold a TOGAF certification at the Foundation level or higher and who work in, or are transitioning to, organizations that have adopted Agile delivery models. It is particularly relevant for architects embedded in Agile teams, Solution Architects operating within SAFe or Scrum environments, and EA practitioners tasked with modernizing their organization's architecture governance to align with iterative development cadences.
Professionals in roles such as Enterprise Architect, Solutions Architect, IT Architect, and Architecture Practice Lead will find this credential most directly applicable. It is also well-suited for Agile Coaches and transformation leads who want a formal understanding of how TOGAF frameworks can coexist with and enhance Agile methods, rather than conflict with them.
Candidates must hold a current TOGAF certification at the Foundation level or higher before pursuing this credential. This means a passing result on the TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Part 1 exam (OGEA-101)—or an equivalent legacy TOGAF 9 Foundation qualification—is a hard requirement. There is no waiver or alternative pathway; the Foundation certification must be in place before attempting the Agile Specialist assessment.
Beyond the formal prerequisite, candidates are expected to have practical experience working as an Enterprise Architect and a working knowledge of Agile methodologies such as Scrum, Kanban, or Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe). Familiarity with the TOGAF ADM phases, architecture governance concepts, and the TOGAF content metamodel will significantly reduce the learning curve. The credential requires completion of the Learning Units defined in The Open Group's Conformance Requirements document before sitting the assessment.
The TOGAF Framework Agile Specialist is assessed through a knowledge-based examination administered via The Open Group's authorized examination platform, delivered by Pearson VUE at accredited test centers or online via Pearson VUE OnVUE proctored delivery. The exam has a time limit of 60 minutes and a passing score of 60%. The question format is multiple choice, consistent with other TOGAF credential-level assessments in the portfolio.
Candidates are required to complete the prescribed Learning Units—estimated at approximately 3 hours of structured self-study—prior to taking the assessment. The credential is a closed-book exam. Upon passing, candidates receive an Open Badge (issued via Credly) and a certificate from The Open Group. If a candidate does not pass, a 30-day waiting period applies before a retake is permitted. The credential does not expire once earned.
Earning the TOGAF Framework Agile Specialist credential signals to employers that an Enterprise Architect can operate effectively in modern Agile delivery environments—a capability increasingly demanded as organizations scale Agile practices beyond individual teams to enterprise-wide transformation programs. It directly complements certifications such as SAFe Architect or PMI-ACP by providing the TOGAF governance and framework layer that those credentials lack, making the combination particularly valuable for architects working within SAFe or LeSS implementations.
The credential strengthens candidacy for roles such as Enterprise Architect, Principal Architect, Agile Transformation Lead, and Architecture Practice Manager in organizations undergoing digital transformation. While The Open Group does not publish salary data, TOGAF-certified architects consistently command above-average compensation in the EA market; the Agile Specialist add-on increases marketability specifically in sectors—financial services, telecommunications, government IT modernization—where Agile at scale and rigorous architecture governance must coexist. The non-expiring nature of the credential means no ongoing recertification cost, and the Open Badge format enables straightforward verification by employers via Credly.
5 sample questions with answers and explanations. The full bank has 589 questions, enough for 9 full-length practice exams.
Preview — answers shown1. Litware Energy has several architecture backlog items for a grid analytics platform. One item is a large modernization theme, one is a timeboxed investigation into an uncertain integration option, and one is a small enabler needed by a delivery team next sprint. How should the architecture owner manage these items? (Select one!)
Explanation
The architecture backlog can contain work at different levels of granularity. The near-term enabler should be refined for sprint selection, the uncertain option should be handled as a timeboxed investigation, and the larger theme can remain visible until it is decomposed. Deleting uncertainty removes valuable risk-reduction work. Moving a large theme directly into a sprint is poor refinement. Hiding the enabler prevents architecture capacity and dependencies from being managed transparently.
2. Contoso Payments wants to let five product teams release wallet features weekly while preserving PCI-related audit evidence, and it has only two enterprise architects available part-time. Which governance approach BEST balances rigor and Agile flexibility? (Select one!)
Explanation
Use a tiered decision model with enterprise guardrails, team-level autonomy for reversible choices, ADRs for significant decisions, and escalation for cross-team or regulated impacts is best because it preserves auditability and control for PCI-sensitive and cross-team decisions while avoiding bottlenecks for local, reversible choices. Require the Architecture Board to approve every design decision before a team can include it in a sprint backlog applies rigor indiscriminately and would slow weekly releases. Allow each team to choose its own security, integration, and data-handling patterns ignores regulated data and shared consistency needs. Run a monthly architecture review of completed work and create remediation items only after release detects issues too late and increases rework.
3. Contoso Manufacturing wants to shift an existing TOGAF practice to Agile delivery while keeping safety-reporting evidence and supporting teams with limited architecture skills. Leaders ask what should change first. Which statement BEST contrasts traditional and Agile TOGAF usage? (Select one!)
Explanation
Agile TOGAF keeps architecture discipline but uses shorter feedback loops, lighter deliverables, and more continuous stakeholder collaboration is best because the company still needs safety evidence and guidance for less experienced teams. Agile TOGAF removes architecture governance fails because governance is adapted, not eliminated, especially where safety evidence is required. Agile TOGAF requires the same comprehensive deliverable set fails because it preserves heavyweight documentation and creates sprint overhead. Agile TOGAF replaces ADM phases with Scrum roles and events fails because Agile practices complement the ADM; they do not make TOGAF concepts or architecture method unnecessary.
4. Tailspin Toys is replacing its warehouse allocation capability while protecting holiday inventory reporting. Four teams work in two-week sprints. A program manager argues that every ADM phase must be completed once, in sequence, before sprint delivery can begin. Which response is BEST? (Select one!)
Explanation
A is best because the TOGAF ADM should not be treated as a mandatory waterfall sequence before any Agile delivery can start. The official Agile Specialist materials identify developing architecture in an Agile way and using sprints with the TOGAF Standard as part of the credential scope, and the official Open Group blog explicitly rejects the misconception that the ADM mandates a fixed waterfall sequence or phase duration. Completing the full cycle first delays feedback. Skipping ADM work removes needed architecture guidance. Running only governance preserves oversight but omits the architecture development and planning needed to guide the sprinting teams.
5. Fabrikam Retail is tailoring TOGAF 10th Edition guidance for Agile inventory teams across several regions. The architecture lead wants a small, auditable method that preserves common ADM terminology while avoiding unnecessary deliverables. Which tailoring approach is MOST appropriate? (Select one!)
Explanation
The best approach is to keep the stable ADM concepts as the common foundation and selectively apply official Agile-related Series Guide guidance. This preserves consistent enterprise architecture language while allowing fit-for-purpose Agile tailoring. Using only Fundamental Content ignores topic-specific Agile guidance. Treating the Series Guides as a replacement for core ADM concepts risks losing TOGAF coherence. Independent tailoring by each squad may reduce documentation locally, but it weakens consistency and auditability across regions.
The Open Group Certified: Integrating Risk and Security within a TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture
TOGAF-RS · 600 questions
TOGAF® Business Architecture Foundation (OGBA-101)
OGBA-101 · 600 questions
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Foundation (OGEA-101)
OGEA-101 · 600 questions
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam (OGEA-102)
OGEA-102 · 600 questions
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Leader
TOGAF EA Leader · 598 questions
TOGAF® Framework Digital Specialist
OG0-DS1 · 598 questions
$17.99
One-time access to this exam