The Open Group · TOGAF-Agile-Specialist
Validates knowledge and understanding of how to adapt and use the TOGAF® framework to support an Agile enterprise. Covers applying the TOGAF ADM using Agile sprints, Agile Enterprise Architecture governance, and Agile Product Management techniques.
Practice Questions
589
≈ 9 practice exams
Duration
60 minutes
Passing Score
60%
Difficulty
SpecialtyLast Updated
Jun 2026
Use this TOGAF-Agile-Specialist practice exam to prepare for The Open Group Certified: TOGAF® Framework Agile Specialist with realistic questions, detailed explanations, and focused study modes. The practice bank includes 589 questions for The Open Group TOGAF-Agile-Specialist, so you can review the exam steadily instead of relying on one long cram session.
As you practice, pay extra attention to recurring topics such as Agility Concepts and Enterprise Architecture, Adapting the TOGAF Standard for Agile Environments, Applying the TOGAF ADM with Agile Sprints, Agile Enterprise Architecture Governance, and Agile Product Management Techniques. Start with short sessions to identify weak areas, then move into timed quizzes once your accuracy is consistent.
The explanations are especially useful when you want to connect exam wording to the responsibilities and scenarios described in the official certification guidance. Use the free preview first, then unlock the full question bank when you are ready to build a complete study routine.
The Open Group Certified: TOGAF® Framework Agile Specialist is a knowledge-based certification credential that validates an Enterprise Architect's ability to adapt and apply the TOGAF® Standard within Agile organizational contexts. It is aligned to The TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition, and focuses specifically on reconciling the structured, phase-based nature of the TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM) with the iterative, sprint-driven practices characteristic of Agile delivery. The credential demonstrates that the holder understands how to reshape the TOGAF framework—including its governance and content metamodel—to support continuous, incremental architecture work rather than traditional waterfall-style engagements.
The certification covers a focused set of competencies: understanding Agile principles in the context of Enterprise Architecture, applying the TOGAF ADM through Agile sprints, implementing Agile EA governance, and leveraging Agile Product Management techniques. It is part of The Open Group's broader TOGAF Certification Portfolio, which includes specialist and leadership credentials that build on the foundational TOGAF Enterprise Architecture qualification. The credential is issued with an Open Badge and a certificate, and it does not expire—remaining tied indefinitely to the specific version of the Body of Knowledge against which it was earned.
This certification is designed for practicing Enterprise Architects who already hold a TOGAF certification at the Foundation level or higher and who work in, or are transitioning to, organizations that have adopted Agile delivery models. It is particularly relevant for architects embedded in Agile teams, Solution Architects operating within SAFe or Scrum environments, and EA practitioners tasked with modernizing their organization's architecture governance to align with iterative development cadences.
Professionals in roles such as Enterprise Architect, Solutions Architect, IT Architect, and Architecture Practice Lead will find this credential most directly applicable. It is also well-suited for Agile Coaches and transformation leads who want a formal understanding of how TOGAF frameworks can coexist with and enhance Agile methods, rather than conflict with them.
Candidates must hold a current TOGAF certification at the Foundation level or higher before pursuing this credential. This means a passing result on the TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Part 1 exam (OGEA-101)—or an equivalent legacy TOGAF 9 Foundation qualification—is a hard requirement. There is no waiver or alternative pathway; the Foundation certification must be in place before attempting the Agile Specialist assessment.
Beyond the formal prerequisite, candidates are expected to have practical experience working as an Enterprise Architect and a working knowledge of Agile methodologies such as Scrum, Kanban, or Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe). Familiarity with the TOGAF ADM phases, architecture governance concepts, and the TOGAF content metamodel will significantly reduce the learning curve. The credential requires completion of the Learning Units defined in The Open Group's Conformance Requirements document before sitting the assessment.
The TOGAF Framework Agile Specialist is assessed through a knowledge-based examination administered via The Open Group's authorized examination platform, delivered by Pearson VUE at accredited test centers or online via Pearson VUE OnVUE proctored delivery. The exam has a time limit of 60 minutes and a passing score of 60%. The question format is multiple choice, consistent with other TOGAF credential-level assessments in the portfolio.
Candidates are required to complete the prescribed Learning Units—estimated at approximately 3 hours of structured self-study—prior to taking the assessment. The credential is a closed-book exam. Upon passing, candidates receive an Open Badge (issued via Credly) and a certificate from The Open Group. If a candidate does not pass, a 30-day waiting period applies before a retake is permitted. The credential does not expire once earned.
Earning the TOGAF Framework Agile Specialist credential signals to employers that an Enterprise Architect can operate effectively in modern Agile delivery environments—a capability increasingly demanded as organizations scale Agile practices beyond individual teams to enterprise-wide transformation programs. It directly complements certifications such as SAFe Architect or PMI-ACP by providing the TOGAF governance and framework layer that those credentials lack, making the combination particularly valuable for architects working within SAFe or LeSS implementations.
The credential strengthens candidacy for roles such as Enterprise Architect, Principal Architect, Agile Transformation Lead, and Architecture Practice Manager in organizations undergoing digital transformation. While The Open Group does not publish salary data, TOGAF-certified architects consistently command above-average compensation in the EA market; the Agile Specialist add-on increases marketability specifically in sectors—financial services, telecommunications, government IT modernization—where Agile at scale and rigorous architecture governance must coexist. The non-expiring nature of the credential means no ongoing recertification cost, and the Open Badge format enables straightforward verification by employers via Credly.
5 sample questions with answers and explanations. The full bank has 589 questions, enough for 9 full-length practice exams.
Preview — answers shown1. Adventure Works wants to apply the ADM while three product teams deliver a claims capability in two-week sprints, but enterprise strategy is reviewed quarterly and privacy rules apply across the whole business unit. Which ADM granularity approach is BEST? (Select one!)
Explanation
Use strategic-level ADM for enterprise guardrails, segment-level ADM for the business unit, and lightweight capability-level ADM for sprint work is correct because ADM can be applied at different levels of scope and cadence. Use only one full enterprise ADM cycle inside every two-week sprint so all levels have identical cadence is wrong because enterprise, segment, and capability concerns differ in scope and time horizon. Use only team-level sprint activities and stop maintaining strategic or segment architecture context is wrong because privacy rules and quarterly strategy require higher-level alignment. Use a strategic ADM cycle once at the start and prohibit capability-level refinement during later sprints is wrong because Agile use of TOGAF expects iterative refinement as delivery learns.
2. Contoso Bank is introducing instant-loan decisions and wants squads to release every two weeks, while regulatory controls require auditable decision traces and the architecture team has only three architects for seven squads. A proposed scoring-service change affects only one squad and can be rolled back without changing enterprise standards. What governance response BEST balances rigor with Agile flexibility? (Select one!)
Explanation
Letting the squad decide within published guardrails and recording the decision in a lightweight architecture decision record fits the local, reversible nature of the change while preserving traceability for audit. It uses delegated authority and just-enough governance rather than either blocking delivery or abandoning control. Requiring Architecture Board approval is too heavy because the decision does not change enterprise standards or affect multiple squads. Suspending architecture governance fails the audit constraint because no durable decision evidence would remain. Creating a full enterprise target architecture update is disproportionate for a local rollback-capable design choice and would waste scarce architect capacity.
3. Contoso Energy is starting an Agile modernization program using two-week sprints. The enterprise architecture team has a large set of existing TOGAF deliverables, but delivery teams say the material is too detailed to use during sprint planning. Which TWO responses are MOST consistent with applying the TOGAF framework with agility? (Select two!)
Multiple correct answersExplanation
Right-sizing relevant TOGAF deliverables and adapting the framework are the best responses because the Agile Specialist scope is about adapting and using TOGAF to support Agile enterprises, not abandoning TOGAF or forcing teams into a heavyweight documentation cycle. Keeping the complete deliverable set unchanged is wrong because it makes sprint planning dependent on a waterfall-style architecture baseline. Moving EA work outside the Agile cadence is wrong because guidance arrives too late to shape delivery. Allowing each team to define local guidance with no enterprise alignment is wrong because Agile autonomy still needs shared principles, constraints, and traceable decisions.
4. Contoso Public Services is starting a permit-modernization initiative, must satisfy accessibility regulations, and has a two-week inception window before three Scrum teams begin delivery. Which sprint activity BEST maps to the TOGAF Preliminary Phase? (Select one!)
Explanation
A Sprint 0 or inception sprint best maps to the Preliminary Phase because it establishes the architecture capability, principles, repository setup, tools, and governance approach before delivery teams depend on them. This fits the two-week inception constraint and accessibility requirement. A migration-planning sprint maps more closely to Phase F, where sequencing and transition planning are addressed. An implementation-governance sprint maps to Phase G and is used to oversee delivery, not establish initial architecture capability. A change-management sprint maps to Phase H and is appropriate after feedback or change triggers exist, not before the initiative begins.
5. Contoso Manufacturing must plan a two-week architecture sprint for plant analytics, has safety-reporting constraints, has developers waiting for integration guidance, and faces uncertainty about message-broker performance. Which backlog item should be selected to reduce risk within the sprint? (Select one!)
Explanation
A timeboxed architecture spike comparing broker options against the required integration needs is the best sprint item because the key issue is performance uncertainty that affects integration guidance and safety-reporting constraints. A spike is small enough for the sprint and produces evidence for a later decision. A broad architecture epic to redesign all manufacturing data flows in the enterprise fails because it is too large and unfocused for the immediate two-week risk. A completed compliance checklist copied from a previous unrelated analytics project fails because it does not answer the broker performance question and may not apply to the current safety context. A team-level implementation task to configure production brokers before architecture evaluation fails because it commits to a solution before reducing the architectural uncertainty that should guide implementation.
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam (OGEA-102)
OGEA-102 · 600 questions
TOGAF® Framework Digital Specialist
OG0-DS1 · 598 questions
The Open Group Certified: Integrating Risk and Security within a TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture
TOGAF-RS · 600 questions
TOGAF® Business Architecture Foundation (OGBA-101)
OGBA-101 · 600 questions
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Foundation (OGEA-101)
OGEA-101 · 600 questions
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Leader
TOGAF EA Leader · 598 questions
$17.99
One-time access to this exam