The Open Group · TOGAF-Agile-Specialist
Validates knowledge and understanding of how to adapt and use the TOGAF® framework to support an Agile enterprise. Covers applying the TOGAF ADM using Agile sprints, Agile Enterprise Architecture governance, and Agile Product Management techniques.
Practice Questions
589
≈ 9 practice exams
Duration
60 minutes
Passing Score
60%
Difficulty
SpecialtyLast Updated
Jun 2026
Use this TOGAF-Agile-Specialist practice exam to prepare for The Open Group Certified: TOGAF® Framework Agile Specialist with realistic questions, detailed explanations, and focused study modes. The practice bank includes 589 questions for The Open Group TOGAF-Agile-Specialist, so you can review the exam steadily instead of relying on one long cram session.
As you practice, pay extra attention to recurring topics such as Agility Concepts and Enterprise Architecture, Adapting the TOGAF Standard for Agile Environments, Applying the TOGAF ADM with Agile Sprints, Agile Enterprise Architecture Governance, and Agile Product Management Techniques. Start with short sessions to identify weak areas, then move into timed quizzes once your accuracy is consistent.
The explanations are especially useful when you want to connect exam wording to the responsibilities and scenarios described in the official certification guidance. Use the free preview first, then unlock the full question bank when you are ready to build a complete study routine.
The Open Group Certified: TOGAF® Framework Agile Specialist is a knowledge-based certification credential that validates an Enterprise Architect's ability to adapt and apply the TOGAF® Standard within Agile organizational contexts. It is aligned to The TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition, and focuses specifically on reconciling the structured, phase-based nature of the TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM) with the iterative, sprint-driven practices characteristic of Agile delivery. The credential demonstrates that the holder understands how to reshape the TOGAF framework—including its governance and content metamodel—to support continuous, incremental architecture work rather than traditional waterfall-style engagements.
The certification covers a focused set of competencies: understanding Agile principles in the context of Enterprise Architecture, applying the TOGAF ADM through Agile sprints, implementing Agile EA governance, and leveraging Agile Product Management techniques. It is part of The Open Group's broader TOGAF Certification Portfolio, which includes specialist and leadership credentials that build on the foundational TOGAF Enterprise Architecture qualification. The credential is issued with an Open Badge and a certificate, and it does not expire—remaining tied indefinitely to the specific version of the Body of Knowledge against which it was earned.
This certification is designed for practicing Enterprise Architects who already hold a TOGAF certification at the Foundation level or higher and who work in, or are transitioning to, organizations that have adopted Agile delivery models. It is particularly relevant for architects embedded in Agile teams, Solution Architects operating within SAFe or Scrum environments, and EA practitioners tasked with modernizing their organization's architecture governance to align with iterative development cadences.
Professionals in roles such as Enterprise Architect, Solutions Architect, IT Architect, and Architecture Practice Lead will find this credential most directly applicable. It is also well-suited for Agile Coaches and transformation leads who want a formal understanding of how TOGAF frameworks can coexist with and enhance Agile methods, rather than conflict with them.
Candidates must hold a current TOGAF certification at the Foundation level or higher before pursuing this credential. This means a passing result on the TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Part 1 exam (OGEA-101)—or an equivalent legacy TOGAF 9 Foundation qualification—is a hard requirement. There is no waiver or alternative pathway; the Foundation certification must be in place before attempting the Agile Specialist assessment.
Beyond the formal prerequisite, candidates are expected to have practical experience working as an Enterprise Architect and a working knowledge of Agile methodologies such as Scrum, Kanban, or Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe). Familiarity with the TOGAF ADM phases, architecture governance concepts, and the TOGAF content metamodel will significantly reduce the learning curve. The credential requires completion of the Learning Units defined in The Open Group's Conformance Requirements document before sitting the assessment.
The TOGAF Framework Agile Specialist is assessed through a knowledge-based examination administered via The Open Group's authorized examination platform, delivered by Pearson VUE at accredited test centers or online via Pearson VUE OnVUE proctored delivery. The exam has a time limit of 60 minutes and a passing score of 60%. The question format is multiple choice, consistent with other TOGAF credential-level assessments in the portfolio.
Candidates are required to complete the prescribed Learning Units—estimated at approximately 3 hours of structured self-study—prior to taking the assessment. The credential is a closed-book exam. Upon passing, candidates receive an Open Badge (issued via Credly) and a certificate from The Open Group. If a candidate does not pass, a 30-day waiting period applies before a retake is permitted. The credential does not expire once earned.
Earning the TOGAF Framework Agile Specialist credential signals to employers that an Enterprise Architect can operate effectively in modern Agile delivery environments—a capability increasingly demanded as organizations scale Agile practices beyond individual teams to enterprise-wide transformation programs. It directly complements certifications such as SAFe Architect or PMI-ACP by providing the TOGAF governance and framework layer that those credentials lack, making the combination particularly valuable for architects working within SAFe or LeSS implementations.
The credential strengthens candidacy for roles such as Enterprise Architect, Principal Architect, Agile Transformation Lead, and Architecture Practice Manager in organizations undergoing digital transformation. While The Open Group does not publish salary data, TOGAF-certified architects consistently command above-average compensation in the EA market; the Agile Specialist add-on increases marketability specifically in sectors—financial services, telecommunications, government IT modernization—where Agile at scale and rigorous architecture governance must coexist. The non-expiring nature of the credential means no ongoing recertification cost, and the Open Badge format enables straightforward verification by employers via Credly.
5 sample questions with answers and explanations. The full bank has 589 questions, enough for 9 full-length practice exams.
Preview — answers shown1. Northwind Utilities wants governance feedback during delivery of outage analytics, must control unauthorized data dependencies, and has a small DevOps team maintaining shared pipelines. What is the BEST first step? (Select one!)
Explanation
Identifying the highest-risk data-dependency rules and automating a small enforceable set is best because it focuses limited DevOps capacity on the risk that matters most. Broad manual reviews may find issues but are harder to scale and provide slower feedback. Automating low-risk rules first builds tooling experience, but it does not address the unauthorized dependency constraint. Advisory warnings can be useful during rollout, but avoiding enforcement for known high-risk rules may let architecture drift continue.
2. Litware Energy wants autonomous Agile teams for a grid-analytics platform. Safety-related data flows must remain governed, and only one enterprise architect is available part-time. Which TWO governance principles are MOST important? (Select two!)
Multiple correct answersExplanation
With safety-related data flows and limited architect capacity, governance must be visible, explicit, and scalable. Making expectations and decision ownership clear supports traceability and evidence without requiring constant central approval. Decentralizing reversible local decisions within guardrails preserves team autonomy while keeping high-impact decisions governed. Quarterly board-only review is too slow for safety-sensitive sprint work. Limiting evidence to enterprise-level decisions may miss important team-level safety implications. Retrospectives are useful feedback mechanisms, but retrospective-only traceability is too late and incomplete for safety-related governance.
3. Adventure Works wants to apply the ADM while three product teams deliver a claims capability in two-week sprints, but enterprise strategy is reviewed quarterly and privacy rules apply across the whole business unit. Which ADM granularity approach is BEST? (Select one!)
Explanation
Use strategic-level ADM for enterprise guardrails, segment-level ADM for the business unit, and lightweight capability-level ADM for sprint work is correct because ADM can be applied at different levels of scope and cadence. Use only one full enterprise ADM cycle inside every two-week sprint so all levels have identical cadence is wrong because enterprise, segment, and capability concerns differ in scope and time horizon. Use only team-level sprint activities and stop maintaining strategic or segment architecture context is wrong because privacy rules and quarterly strategy require higher-level alignment. Use a strategic ADM cycle once at the start and prohibit capability-level refinement during later sprints is wrong because Agile use of TOGAF expects iterative refinement as delivery learns.
4. Tailspin Manufacturing is preparing a release train for factory telemetry, with plant downtime penalties and only three platform specialists available before team-level sprint planning. Which architecture runway condition indicates the architects should prioritize enabler work before more feature design? (Select one!)
Explanation
Repeated blocking and inconsistent local choices are symptoms of an architecture runway that is too short. Prioritizing enabler work helps create the foundation needed for upcoming features and reduces downtime-related delivery risk. Teams starting planned features smoothly indicates a right-sized runway, not a need for urgent runway expansion. Standards for unplanned capabilities suggest the runway may be too long or misdirected. A mixed, ordered architecture backlog is healthy when it reflects delivery need; it is not itself evidence of insufficient runway.
5. Wide World Importers is assigning ownership for an enterprise data-sharing architecture, must comply with data governance policies, and has delivery teams that expect backlog decisions within one sprint. Which responsibility BEST describes the architecture owner in an Agile product management approach? (Select one!)
Explanation
Owning and ordering the architecture backlog, accepting architecture increments, and balancing stakeholder value with governance constraints is the best description of architecture product ownership. It treats architecture as a living product and connects backlog decisions to value, risk, and compliance. Approving every development task before implementation turns ownership into a bottleneck and confuses architecture ownership with team-level task control. Creating a complete target architecture once and transferring ownership to a project manager reflects a project mindset, not ongoing product ownership. Focusing only on compliance exceptions narrows the role to governance and leaves value discovery and prioritization unmanaged.
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam (OGEA-102)
OGEA-102 · 600 questions
TOGAF® Framework Digital Specialist
OG0-DS1 · 598 questions
The Open Group Certified: Integrating Risk and Security within a TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture
TOGAF-RS · 600 questions
TOGAF® Business Architecture Foundation (OGBA-101)
OGBA-101 · 600 questions
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Foundation (OGEA-101)
OGEA-101 · 600 questions
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Leader
TOGAF EA Leader · 598 questions
$17.99
One-time access to this exam