The Open Group · TOGAF-Agile-Specialist
Validates knowledge and understanding of how to adapt and use the TOGAF® framework to support an Agile enterprise. Covers applying the TOGAF ADM using Agile sprints, Agile Enterprise Architecture governance, and Agile Product Management techniques.
Practice Questions
589
≈ 9 practice exams
Duration
60 minutes
Passing Score
60%
Difficulty
SpecialtyLast Updated
Jun 2026
Use this TOGAF-Agile-Specialist practice exam to prepare for The Open Group Certified: TOGAF® Framework Agile Specialist with realistic questions, detailed explanations, and focused study modes. The practice bank includes 589 questions for The Open Group TOGAF-Agile-Specialist, so you can review the exam steadily instead of relying on one long cram session.
As you practice, pay extra attention to recurring topics such as Agility Concepts and Enterprise Architecture, Adapting the TOGAF Standard for Agile Environments, Applying the TOGAF ADM with Agile Sprints, Agile Enterprise Architecture Governance, and Agile Product Management Techniques. Start with short sessions to identify weak areas, then move into timed quizzes once your accuracy is consistent.
The explanations are especially useful when you want to connect exam wording to the responsibilities and scenarios described in the official certification guidance. Use the free preview first, then unlock the full question bank when you are ready to build a complete study routine.
The Open Group Certified: TOGAF® Framework Agile Specialist is a knowledge-based certification credential that validates an Enterprise Architect's ability to adapt and apply the TOGAF® Standard within Agile organizational contexts. It is aligned to The TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition, and focuses specifically on reconciling the structured, phase-based nature of the TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM) with the iterative, sprint-driven practices characteristic of Agile delivery. The credential demonstrates that the holder understands how to reshape the TOGAF framework—including its governance and content metamodel—to support continuous, incremental architecture work rather than traditional waterfall-style engagements.
The certification covers a focused set of competencies: understanding Agile principles in the context of Enterprise Architecture, applying the TOGAF ADM through Agile sprints, implementing Agile EA governance, and leveraging Agile Product Management techniques. It is part of The Open Group's broader TOGAF Certification Portfolio, which includes specialist and leadership credentials that build on the foundational TOGAF Enterprise Architecture qualification. The credential is issued with an Open Badge and a certificate, and it does not expire—remaining tied indefinitely to the specific version of the Body of Knowledge against which it was earned.
This certification is designed for practicing Enterprise Architects who already hold a TOGAF certification at the Foundation level or higher and who work in, or are transitioning to, organizations that have adopted Agile delivery models. It is particularly relevant for architects embedded in Agile teams, Solution Architects operating within SAFe or Scrum environments, and EA practitioners tasked with modernizing their organization's architecture governance to align with iterative development cadences.
Professionals in roles such as Enterprise Architect, Solutions Architect, IT Architect, and Architecture Practice Lead will find this credential most directly applicable. It is also well-suited for Agile Coaches and transformation leads who want a formal understanding of how TOGAF frameworks can coexist with and enhance Agile methods, rather than conflict with them.
Candidates must hold a current TOGAF certification at the Foundation level or higher before pursuing this credential. This means a passing result on the TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Part 1 exam (OGEA-101)—or an equivalent legacy TOGAF 9 Foundation qualification—is a hard requirement. There is no waiver or alternative pathway; the Foundation certification must be in place before attempting the Agile Specialist assessment.
Beyond the formal prerequisite, candidates are expected to have practical experience working as an Enterprise Architect and a working knowledge of Agile methodologies such as Scrum, Kanban, or Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe). Familiarity with the TOGAF ADM phases, architecture governance concepts, and the TOGAF content metamodel will significantly reduce the learning curve. The credential requires completion of the Learning Units defined in The Open Group's Conformance Requirements document before sitting the assessment.
The TOGAF Framework Agile Specialist is assessed through a knowledge-based examination administered via The Open Group's authorized examination platform, delivered by Pearson VUE at accredited test centers or online via Pearson VUE OnVUE proctored delivery. The exam has a time limit of 60 minutes and a passing score of 60%. The question format is multiple choice, consistent with other TOGAF credential-level assessments in the portfolio.
Candidates are required to complete the prescribed Learning Units—estimated at approximately 3 hours of structured self-study—prior to taking the assessment. The credential is a closed-book exam. Upon passing, candidates receive an Open Badge (issued via Credly) and a certificate from The Open Group. If a candidate does not pass, a 30-day waiting period applies before a retake is permitted. The credential does not expire once earned.
Earning the TOGAF Framework Agile Specialist credential signals to employers that an Enterprise Architect can operate effectively in modern Agile delivery environments—a capability increasingly demanded as organizations scale Agile practices beyond individual teams to enterprise-wide transformation programs. It directly complements certifications such as SAFe Architect or PMI-ACP by providing the TOGAF governance and framework layer that those credentials lack, making the combination particularly valuable for architects working within SAFe or LeSS implementations.
The credential strengthens candidacy for roles such as Enterprise Architect, Principal Architect, Agile Transformation Lead, and Architecture Practice Manager in organizations undergoing digital transformation. While The Open Group does not publish salary data, TOGAF-certified architects consistently command above-average compensation in the EA market; the Agile Specialist add-on increases marketability specifically in sectors—financial services, telecommunications, government IT modernization—where Agile at scale and rigorous architecture governance must coexist. The non-expiring nature of the credential means no ongoing recertification cost, and the Open Badge format enables straightforward verification by employers via Credly.
5 sample questions with answers and explanations. The full bank has 589 questions, enough for 9 full-length practice exams.
Preview — answers shown1. Fabrikam Media is launching a streaming analytics service with a fixed beta date, limited data-architecture capacity, and uncertainty about event volume. Which architecture backlog item type is BEST for evaluating whether the proposed streaming pattern will scale? (Select one!)
Explanation
Architecture spike is best because the issue is uncertainty about event volume and scalability, and the team needs a time-boxed investigation before committing to a pattern under a fixed beta date. Architecture debt item is plausible because scaling problems can become debt, but here the work is exploratory rather than remediation of a known deviation. Compliance item would be appropriate for a regulatory or standards obligation, not a technical learning question. Architecture epic is too large and broad for the immediate need; the spike may later inform an epic, enabler, or platform feature.
2. Proseware Manufacturing wants to prioritize architecture initiatives for factory telemetry, but plant downtime penalties start next quarter and the architecture team has limited capacity for large platform changes. Which TWO factors are part of the cost-of-delay side of WSJF? (Select two!)
Multiple correct answersExplanation
User or business value and Time criticality are correct because WSJF uses cost of delay, commonly composed of business value, time criticality, and risk reduction or opportunity enablement, divided by job size. Job size or duration is wrong for this question because it is the denominator of WSJF, not part of cost of delay. Sprint velocity trend is wrong because velocity may inform capacity planning, but it is not a standard cost-of-delay component. Number of architects assigned is wrong because staffing may influence job duration or feasibility, but it is not one of the economic value components used to calculate cost of delay.
3. Adventure Works Public Sector is starting a citizen portal, must meet accessibility rules, has delivery teams new to TOGAF, and needs architecture principles and tooling ready before feature sprints. Which ADM phase most closely maps to a Sprint 0 or inception sprint? (Select one!)
Explanation
Preliminary Phase most closely maps to a Sprint 0 or inception sprint because it establishes the architecture capability, principles, governance approach, and supporting repository or tooling that teams need before delivery begins. This fits the portal context where accessibility obligations and new TOGAF skills require shared working rules. Phase E, Opportunities and Solutions fails because it identifies solution options and roadmap work after vision and architecture definition have progressed. Phase G, Implementation Governance fails because it monitors conformance during implementation, not the initial setup of architecture capability. Phase H, Architecture Change Management fails because it handles change and evolution after architecture and delivery feedback exist, rather than preparing the initial working environment.
4. Contoso Public Services is starting an architecture sprint for a permit portal, but accessibility rules are mandatory and the newly formed team lacks agreed architecture principles or repository practices. Which ADM phase most closely maps to the initial sprint setup work? (Select one!)
Explanation
Preliminary Phase is correct because initial setup work such as architecture principles, governance approach, methods, tools, and repository practices aligns with establishing the architecture capability before detailed architecture definition. Phase E: Opportunities and Solutions is wrong because it focuses on identifying solution options, work packages, and roadmap content after architecture direction is better understood. Phase G: Implementation Governance is wrong because it governs implementation against architecture, which is premature before principles and practices are established. Phase H: Architecture Change Management is wrong because it handles change and evolution of an existing architecture baseline rather than initial architecture capability setup for a new team.
5. Fabrikam Health is preparing a two-sprint architecture iteration for a patient referral capability, must satisfy privacy controls, and has limited clinician availability for backlog discussions. The team needs a simple method to decide which architecture items are non-negotiable for the next iteration and which can be deferred. Which technique should the architecture owner use? (Select one!)
Explanation
MoSCoW prioritization is the best fit because the decision is about fixed iteration capacity and deciding what must be included, what should be included, what could be included, and what will be deferred. It is simple enough for constrained stakeholder time and works well for near-term sprint or iteration scope. RICE scoring can be valuable when reach, impact, confidence, and effort data are available, but this scenario does not provide reliable usage data. Weighted Shortest Job First is stronger for sequencing larger program-level initiatives using cost of delay and size, which is more analysis than needed here. Risk-value matrix highlights risk and value trade-offs, but it does not classify near-term scope commitments as directly as MoSCoW.
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam (OGEA-102)
OGEA-102 · 600 questions
TOGAF® Framework Digital Specialist
OG0-DS1 · 598 questions
The Open Group Certified: Integrating Risk and Security within a TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture
TOGAF-RS · 600 questions
TOGAF® Business Architecture Foundation (OGBA-101)
OGBA-101 · 600 questions
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Foundation (OGEA-101)
OGEA-101 · 600 questions
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Leader
TOGAF EA Leader · 598 questions
$29.99
One-time access to this exam