The Open Group · TOGAF-RS
This credential validates an individual's understanding of essential security and risk concepts in relation to the TOGAF® Architecture Development Method (ADM), including Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), Information Security Management (ISM), and Enterprise Security Architecture (ESA). It demonstrates knowledge of how IT security and risk standards such as ISO/IEC 27000, ISO 31000, and COBIT relate to the TOGAF standard.
Practice Questions
600
≈ 10 practice exams
Duration
180 minutes
Passing Score
Pass/Fail
Difficulty
FoundationalLast Updated
Jun 2026
Use this TOGAF-RS practice exam to prepare for The Open Group Certified: Integrating Risk and Security within a TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture with realistic questions, detailed explanations, and focused study modes. The practice bank includes 600 questions for The Open Group TOGAF-RS, so you can review the exam steadily instead of relying on one long cram session.
As you practice, pay extra attention to recurring topics such as Security and Risk Concepts in TOGAF ADM, Enterprise Security Architecture (ESA), Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), Information Security Management (ISM), and IT Security and Risk Standards (ISO/IEC 27000, ISO 31000, COBIT). Start with short sessions to identify weak areas, then move into timed quizzes once your accuracy is consistent.
The explanations are especially useful when you want to connect exam wording to the responsibilities and scenarios described in the official certification guidance. Use the free preview first, then unlock the full question bank when you are ready to build a complete study routine.
The Open Group Certified: Integrating Risk and Security within a TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture is an awareness-level credential that validates foundational knowledge of how security and risk management integrate with the TOGAF® Architecture Development Method (ADM). It demonstrates that the holder understands the essential concepts of Enterprise Security Architecture (ESA), Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), and Information Security Management (ISM), and knows how these disciplines relate to each phase and artifact of the TOGAF ADM. The credential is part of the broader TOGAF Certification Portfolio built upon the TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition, and is designed to establish a common language between Security Architects and Enterprise Architects when developing risk-aware enterprise architectures.
The certification also covers how major IT security and risk standards — specifically the ISO/IEC 27000 family of standards, ISO 31000, and COBIT® — relate to and complement the TOGAF standard. Candidates learn why security and risk management must be treated as cross-cutting concerns that span the entire enterprise architecture lifecycle rather than being addressed in isolated phases. The credential is structured as a compact learning credential requiring approximately three hours of study, making it accessible as a standalone qualification or as a complement to broader TOGAF Enterprise Architecture certifications.
This credential is designed for professionals who need a structured, foundational understanding of security and risk concepts in the context of enterprise architecture. Primary audiences include Enterprise Architects who want to incorporate security and risk practices into their TOGAF ADM work, Security Architects seeking to align their practice with enterprise architecture frameworks, and IT risk and compliance professionals who collaborate with architecture teams. It is equally relevant for individuals working with governance frameworks such as COBIT or standards like ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 31000 who need to understand how these standards interact with the TOGAF methodology.
Because the credential is at the awareness level with no prerequisites, it is well-suited to those who are early in their enterprise architecture or security architecture careers, as well as experienced practitioners expanding their knowledge into adjacent disciplines. Program managers, IT auditors, and CISOs who need to communicate with architecture teams or evaluate security architecture outputs will also find the credential valuable.
There are no formal prerequisites to sit for this credential. Candidates are not required to hold any prior TOGAF certification, though familiarity with the basic concepts of the TOGAF ADM — such as the architecture phases (Preliminary through Architecture Change Management) and core TOGAF terminology — will help candidates contextualize the security and risk content more effectively. No prior security certifications are required.
In practice, candidates will benefit from some exposure to enterprise IT environments and a general awareness of IT governance concepts. Those with experience in security operations, IT risk management, or enterprise architecture will find the material more immediately applicable. The Open Group offers a self-study option through its learning management system for candidates who wish to build prerequisite TOGAF knowledge before attempting this credential.
The assessment for this credential is delivered either through an Accredited Training Course (ATC) provider — in which case the assessment format is at the provider's discretion — or through The Open Group's own self-study online learning option, which includes a built-in assessment. The self-study path is available through The Open Group's online shop and learning management system. The credential requires a minimum of three hours of learning to be completed before the assessment is attempted. The Open Group awards a digital Open Badge via Credly and a certificate upon successful completion.
Where scenario-based questions are used, as is common across the TOGAF Certification Portfolio, each question presents a real-world scenario with four possible answers ranked from best to worst. Under this model, the best answer earns 5 points, the second-best 3 points, the third-best 1 point, and the worst answer 0 points. Specific details such as the total number of questions and a published numeric passing score are not publicly disclosed by The Open Group for this credential; candidates should confirm the precise assessment parameters with their chosen training provider or The Open Group's official exam portal. The overall credential is classified as a pass/fail award.
Earning this credential signals to employers that an architect or security professional understands how to embed risk and security thinking into enterprise architecture work from the outset, rather than treating them as compliance afterthoughts. It is particularly valued in organizations that have adopted TOGAF as their architecture framework and are seeking to align security governance with frameworks like ISO/IEC 27001 or COBIT. Roles that benefit directly from this credential include Enterprise Architect, Security Architect, IT Risk Manager, IT Governance Analyst, and Information Security Manager. Because it is an awareness-level credential, it is often pursued alongside or as preparation for higher-level TOGAF certifications rather than as a standalone career milestone.
The credential carries one point in The Open Group's TOGAF Certification Portfolio, contributing to broader TOGAF professional recognition. While salary data specific to this credential is not published, professionals who combine TOGAF certification with security and risk specialization are well positioned for senior architecture and governance roles. Industry demand for architects who can speak fluently across security, risk, and enterprise architecture continues to grow, particularly in regulated sectors such as financial services, healthcare, and government, where risk-aware architecture is a compliance requirement.
5 sample questions with answers and explanations. The full bank has 600 questions, enough for 10 full-length practice exams.
Preview — answers shown1. The quantitative risk team at Contoso Insurance is applying the Open FAIR framework to assess a specific cyber risk scenario. The analysis determines that the Threat Event Frequency (TEF) is 20 events per year, and the probability that a threat event results in an actual loss event is 25%. What is the Loss Event Frequency (LEF) for this scenario? (Select one!)
Explanation
In Open FAIR, Loss Event Frequency (LEF) is calculated as TEF multiplied by Vulnerability, where Vulnerability is defined as the probability that a threat event becomes a loss event expressed as a value between 0 and 100%. With a TEF of 20 events per year and a Vulnerability of 25% (0.25), LEF equals 20 multiplied by 0.25, which equals 5 events per year. The value of 45 events per year results from incorrectly adding TEF to the raw Vulnerability percentage rather than multiplying. The value of 80 events per year results from inverting the Vulnerability fraction before multiplying. The value of 20 events per year confuses LEF with TEF, ignoring the critical distinction that not all threat events result in actual loss events — Vulnerability acts as a filter that converts Threat Event Frequency into Loss Event Frequency.
2. A safety engineer at Contoso Chemical is conducting a risk assessment of a newly designed industrial processing pipeline. The team needs a structured examination technique that systematically explores how deviations from design intent could produce hazardous conditions. Which IEC 31010 risk assessment technique is most appropriate for this scenario? (Select one!)
Explanation
HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study) is an IEC 31010 technique specifically designed for structured, team-based examination of processes and engineering systems to identify deviations from design intent. It uses systematic guide words such as more, less, reverse, and other than to explore how operational deviations can lead to hazardous conditions, making it the natural fit for industrial pipeline assessments. The Delphi technique relies on iterative anonymous expert consensus and is not structured around physical deviation analysis. Monte Carlo simulation is a quantitative probabilistic technique used to model uncertainty across many variables simultaneously and is not focused on identifying deviation-based hazards. Fault tree analysis uses a top-down logic diagram to trace how a specific undesired event could occur, rather than proactively exploring all possible deviations from normal operation.
3. The risk engineering team at Fourth Coffee is conducting a comprehensive analysis of a new industrial IoT deployment for their automated brewing operations. They need to systematically examine each potential failure mode in the system and analyze the resulting effects on operations. Which risk assessment technique from IEC 31010 is best suited for this purpose? (Select one!)
Explanation
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is specifically designed to systematically identify potential failure modes in a system, analyze their effects, and evaluate their consequences on operations. It is the appropriate IEC 31010 technique when the goal is to examine what can go wrong in each component and determine the resulting operational impact. Bow-tie analysis is better suited for visualizing the pathway between causes, a central hazard event, and its downstream consequences. Monte Carlo simulation is used for probabilistic modeling of uncertain outcomes across many iterations, not for systematic failure mode examination. The Delphi technique is a structured expert consensus method used when quantitative data is unavailable, relying on iterative expert opinion rather than component-level failure analysis.
4. A security architect at Contoso Financial Services is introducing the SABSA framework to a team of enterprise architects unfamiliar with it. A senior architect asks which layer of the SABSA model captures the pure business perspective — focusing on what needs to be protected and why — without introducing any technical implementation considerations. Which SABSA layer should the architect identify? (Select one!)
Explanation
The Contextual Layer is the topmost layer of the SABSA model and represents the pure business view of security. It captures the organizational context, business requirements, and the rationale for security — addressing what assets need protection and why — without introducing technical or architectural detail. The Conceptual Layer translates business requirements into security concepts and principles for the architect's view. The Logical Layer addresses the design of security services for the designer's perspective. The Component Layer focuses on specific security products and technologies for implementation purposes. SABSA was deliberately structured to place business requirements first, working downward through successive layers toward technical implementation, ensuring that security decisions remain grounded in business context throughout the architecture process.
5. During a security risk workshop at Litware Manufacturing, the risk management team is analyzing a critical production system failure scenario. The team wants to systematically identify all possible contributing causes of the failure by starting with the known undesired event and tracing backward through a logical tree structure. Which IEC 31010 risk assessment technique should the team use? (Select one!)
Explanation
Fault tree analysis is a top-down, deductive technique that begins with a known undesired event and systematically identifies all possible contributing causes arranged in a logical tree structure, making it ideal for root cause investigation of a specific failure scenario. Event tree analysis is the opposite approach, starting with an initiating event and tracing forward to model potential consequences. Monte Carlo simulation uses probabilistic random sampling to model uncertainty across a range of outcomes, rather than identifying causal chains from a known failure. Bow-tie analysis combines fault tree and event tree perspectives to display both causes and consequences around a central hazard event, but does not focus exclusively on backward root cause tracing from a known undesired outcome.
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Leader
TOGAF EA Leader · 598 questions
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Part 2 Exam (OGEA-102)
OGEA-102 · 600 questions
TOGAF® Framework Digital Specialist
OG0-DS1 · 598 questions
The Open Group Certified: TOGAF® Framework Agile Specialist
TOGAF-Agile-Specialist · 589 questions
TOGAF® Business Architecture Foundation (OGBA-101)
OGBA-101 · 600 questions
TOGAF® Enterprise Architecture Foundation (OGEA-101)
OGEA-101 · 600 questions
$29.99
One-time access to this exam