Microsoft · AI-103
Validates skills in developing AI-infused applications and agents on Azure using Python and Microsoft Foundry, including generative AI solutions, RAG pipelines, multi-agent orchestration, and production AI deployments.
Practice Questions
409
≈ 8 practice exams
Duration
120 minutes
Passing Score
700/1000
Difficulty
AssociateLast Updated
Sep 2026
Microsoft retired AI-102 and the Azure AI Engineer Associate certification on June 30, 2026, and AI-103 (Developing AI Apps and Agents on Azure) is the confirmed successor, leading to the new Microsoft Certified: Azure AI Apps and Agents Developer Associate credential. If you searched for AI-102 practice material, AI-103 is the exam Microsoft now points candidates toward, and it is live and schedulable through Pearson VUE today. The center of gravity has shifted hard toward generative AI: per the skills outline dated April 16, 2026, implementing generative AI and agentic solutions is the single largest domain at 30-35%, ahead of planning and managing an Azure AI solution at 25-30%. Computer vision, text analysis, and information extraction solutions round out the outline at 10-15% each. The real differentiator versus AI-102 is Microsoft Foundry: AI-103 tests building generative applications and agents inside Foundry projects, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines, multi-agent orchestration, tool-augmented workflows, and agent evaluation and observability, none of which existed in the old AI-102 blueprint. This 409-question bank is built to that current AI-103 outline, weighted to match the generative AI and agentic emphasis rather than treating it as a minor add-on.
AI-103 runs 120 minutes, 20 minutes longer than AI-102's 100-minute slot, and keeps Microsoft's familiar scaled scoring model: you need 700 out of a possible 1,000 to pass. Microsoft does not publish an exact number of exam-day questions for AI-103, but its associate-level exams typically run in the 40-to-60 question range, mixing multiple-choice, drag-and-drop, and scenario-based case studies delivered through Pearson VUE, either at a testing center or via online proctoring. The credential expires annually, like other Microsoft Associate certifications, and renews through a free online assessment on Microsoft Learn, so budget time each year to stay current as Foundry and the underlying services keep shipping features. Expect the exam to lean heavily on applied, scenario-based judgment: choosing the right Foundry service or model for a task, designing RAG ingestion and retrieval pipelines, wiring multi-agent orchestration with tool access controls, and configuring responsible AI guardrails, rather than testing service names in isolation. Because this is a newer exam with a limited public track record of candidate reports, treat any third-party claims about exact question counts or item difficulty with caution and rely on the official Microsoft study guide as ground truth.
AI-103 has no formal prerequisite exam or certification, but Microsoft's candidate profile is explicit: you should have hands-on experience building applications with Python, and unlike AI-102, which accepted either Python or C#, the AI-103 audience profile names Python specifically. You should also be comfortable with general AI and generative AI concepts and familiar with core Azure services, since the exam expects you to collaborate conceptually with solution architects, data scientists, DevOps engineers, and cloud security engineers. The exam is commonly listed at $165 USD in the United States through Pearson VUE, though Microsoft prices exams by the country or region where you sit the test, so check your local price before scheduling. If you are coming from AI-102, expect real overlap on Azure AI service fundamentals, computer vision, and text analysis, but plan to add dedicated study time for Foundry projects, agent building, and RAG, the topics AI-102 never covered. Start with the 30 free questions in this 409-question bank to gauge where you stand, then work through the full set until your accuracy holds steady across all five domains, with extra reps on the generative AI and agentic solutions domain given its 30-35% weight.
The Microsoft Certified: Azure AI Apps and Agents Developer Associate credential, earned by passing exam AI-103 (Developing AI Apps and Agents on Azure), validates the ability to build, manage, and deploy AI-infused applications and agents on Azure using Microsoft Foundry. It is Microsoft's confirmed successor to the Azure AI Engineer Associate certification (exam AI-102), which was retired on June 30, 2026 along with its renewal assessment. AI-103 is live and schedulable through Pearson VUE, and its skills outline, dated April 16, 2026, reflects a substantial rewrite of the old AI-102 blueprint rather than a light refresh.
Where AI-102 organized its content around individual Azure AI services (Vision, Language, Speech, Document Intelligence) plus a small agentic slice, AI-103 restructures around Microsoft Foundry as the unifying platform: choosing and deploying models, building generative applications and RAG pipelines, constructing and orchestrating multi-agent systems, and applying responsible AI controls across all of it. Computer vision, text analysis, and information extraction remain on the exam, but each is now scoped to Foundry-based, multimodal, and generative workflows rather than standalone service calls. Candidates who held or studied for AI-102 will recognize the underlying Azure AI services but should expect a meaningfully different exam.
AI-103 targets Azure AI engineers and developers who use Python and Azure services to plan, implement, and manage AI solutions and agents built on Microsoft Foundry. Per Microsoft's own candidate profile, this person collaborates with business stakeholders, solution architects, data scientists, DevOps engineers, and cloud security engineers to design, implement, and maintain production AI solutions, not just prototype them.
The certification suits developers already comfortable with general AI and generative AI concepts who want to formalize skills in agent building, RAG, and multi-agent orchestration, as well as AI-102 holders whose certification is aging out and who need a current, recognized credential now that AI-102 and its renewal path are retired. It is less suited to complete beginners with no application-development background, since the exam assumes real Python coding experience rather than conceptual familiarity alone.
AI-103 has no mandatory prerequisite exam or certification and no minimum years-of-experience requirement enforced at registration. That said, Microsoft's official candidate profile is specific about the experience it expects: hands-on experience developing applications using Python, plus familiarity with the capabilities of general AI, generative AI, and core Azure services. This is a change from AI-102, whose candidate profile accepted either Python or C#; AI-103 names Python specifically, so C#-only developers will need to build Python fluency before sitting the exam.
Beyond language skills, candidates should be comfortable with foundational Azure AI concepts (models, endpoints, deployments) and should have some exposure to concepts like retrieval-augmented generation, vector search, and agent-based architectures, since the exam tests applying these patterns in Foundry rather than defining them from scratch. Microsoft's official AI-103 study guide and the AI-103T00-A instructor-led course are the recommended starting points for candidates who need to build this baseline before attempting practice questions.
AI-103 runs 120 minutes, 20 minutes longer than AI-102's 100-minute window, and is delivered as a proctored, computer-based exam through Pearson VUE, either at a physical testing center or via online proctoring. Microsoft has not published an exact question count for AI-103, but its Associate-level exams have historically run in the 40-to-60 question range, mixing multiple-choice, drag-and-drop, and scenario-based case-study formats. A score of 700 or higher on a scale of 100 to 1,000 is required to pass, the same scaled-scoring model Microsoft uses across its certification portfolio.
The exam is commonly listed at $165 USD when proctored in the United States, though Microsoft prices exams by the country or region in which you sit the test, so candidates outside the US should confirm local pricing on the official exam page before registering. Like other Microsoft Associate and Expert certifications, this credential expires annually and renews through a free online assessment on Microsoft Learn rather than a full exam retake, provided you renew before expiration. Retakes of a failed attempt are available 24 hours after the first attempt, with longer waiting periods for subsequent retakes.
AI-103 positions developers for Azure AI engineer, AI application developer, and generative AI / agent engineer roles, the same career lane AI-102 served before retirement, now updated for Foundry-based, agentic development. Typical job titles include Azure AI Engineer, AI Solutions Developer, Generative AI Engineer, and Conversational AI / Agent Developer. Third-party salary trackers put Azure AI Engineer pay in the United States at roughly $90,000 to $129,500 for the middle 50% of earners, with a reported average near $111,500 and top earners around $145,000 annually as of September 2026; more experienced specialists in generative AI and agent engineering can command $150,000 or more depending on role and location.
Because AI-103 is the only current Associate-level path for Microsoft Foundry, agentic, and generative AI development skills, it also functions as a forward-looking credential for developers who do not hold AI-102 at all and want to enter Azure AI development directly at the current, Foundry-centered blueprint. Since the certification renews annually through a free Microsoft Learn assessment rather than a full retake, maintaining it costs time rather than money, which keeps it attractive as a resume signal that stays current with a fast-moving platform.
5 sample questions with answers and explanations. The full bank has 409 questions, enough for 8 full-length practice exams.
Preview — answers shown1. A regional utility is launching a maintenance assistant over private manuals that change after every equipment update. Technicians ask both exact asset-code questions and natural-language troubleshooting questions. The assistant must ground responses in the latest authorized content without retraining the model whenever a manual changes. Which design best meets the requirement? (Select one!)
Explanation
RAG retrieves current authorized passages at inference time, so answers can be grounded in changing private manuals without retraining. Fine-tuning changes model behavior rather than providing fresh knowledge. Placing manuals in a prompt is impractical and stale, while a classifier cannot retrieve evidence for varied technician questions.
2. A delivery organization uses source control for agent instructions, tool schemas, infrastructure definitions, and evaluation datasets. It needs repeatable promotion into isolated development, test, and production environments without manually recreating assets. Which approach best supports that goal? (Select one!)
Explanation
A CI/CD pipeline supports repeatable, reviewable promotion of versioned agent assets and infrastructure across isolated environments. Manual copying is error-prone, changing a shared production project in place weakens isolation and rollback, and excluding tool schemas from source control prevents dependable validation and release traceability.
3. A customer-care system defines a reusable agent configuration with instructions and a `lookup_order` tool schema. Each request must retain its own message history, and the application must be able to execute the same agent behavior for many customers. Which mapping is correct? (Select one!)
Explanation
An agent defines reusable behavior, a conversation can persist the history for an individual interaction context, and a response performs an execution. Reversing these roles confuses configuration, state, and execution; a tool schema describes callable inputs and outputs rather than conversation storage.
4. Woodgrove Manufacturing is creating an internal assistant for three workloads. It must classify short maintenance notes at high volume, summarize long engineering procedures with nuanced reasoning, and inspect a photo plus a technician comment to identify visible damage. The team wants to avoid paying for a larger model where it adds no value. Which model-selection approach best meets these requirements? (Select one!)
Explanation
Model selection should match capability and workload needs. A small language model can efficiently handle constrained high-volume classification, an LLM suits complex long-form reasoning, and a multimodal model can interpret image and text together. One LLM wastes capacity, one multimodal model is unnecessary for text-only tasks, and embedding models support similarity retrieval rather than general summarization.
5. A product engineering group is designing a workflow for incident reports. Uploaded evidence must be validated before extraction. Extraction must finish before a risk score can be calculated, but customer notification and an internal audit record can be created independently after the score is available. The group wants minimal coordination complexity while respecting every dependency. Which orchestration design meets the requirement? (Select one!)
Explanation
Dependent work requires sequential orchestration: validation precedes extraction, and extraction precedes scoring. After scoring, notification and audit recording are independent and can run concurrently. A full concurrent design violates dependencies, handoff changes ownership rather than enforcing stages, and group chat adds unnecessary shared-discussion coordination.
Yes. Microsoft retired AI-102 and the Azure AI Engineer Associate certification on June 30, 2026. AI-103 (Developing AI Apps and Agents on Azure) is the confirmed successor, leading to the Microsoft Certified: Azure AI Apps and Agents Developer Associate credential, and it is live and schedulable through Pearson VUE.
AI-103 runs 120 minutes instead of AI-102's 100, centers on Microsoft Foundry (agent building, RAG pipelines, multi-agent orchestration), and weights generative AI and agentic solutions at 30-35% of the exam, its largest domain. Its candidate profile also names Python specifically, where AI-102 accepted Python or C#. Computer vision, text analysis, and information extraction drop to 10-15% each.
Per the skills outline dated April 16, 2026: plan and manage an Azure AI solution (25-30%), implement generative AI and agentic solutions (30-35%), implement computer vision solutions (10-15%), implement text analysis solutions (10-15%), and implement information extraction solutions (10-15%).
The exam runs 120 minutes, and you need a scaled score of 700 out of 1,000 to pass, the same scoring model Microsoft uses across its Associate-level exams. Microsoft has not published an exact question count, though its associate exams typically run 40 to 60 questions.
Yes. Microsoft's candidate profile for AI-103 specifically calls for experience developing apps in Python, a change from AI-102, which accepted Python or C#. You should also be familiar with general AI and generative AI concepts and core Azure services.
AI-103 is commonly listed at $165 USD when proctored in the United States through Pearson VUE. Microsoft prices exams by the country or region where you sit the test, so confirm your local price on the official exam page before scheduling.
Administering Windows Server Hybrid Core Infrastructure (AZ-800)
AZ-800 · 898 questions
Microsoft Certified: Agentic AI Business Solutions Architect (AB-100)
AB-100 · 700 questions
Microsoft Certified: Azure Administrator Associate (AZ-104)
AZ-104 · 757 questions
Microsoft Certified: Azure AI Engineer Associate (AI-102)
AI-102 · 1392 questions
Microsoft Certified: Azure AI Fundamentals (AI-900)
AI-900 · 464 questions
Microsoft Azure AI Fundamentals (AI-901)
AI-901 · 600 questions
$17.99
One-time access to this exam