Microsoft • SC-300
Design, implement, and operate an organization's identity and access management using Microsoft Entra ID, including implementing identity governance and Zero Trust principles.
Questions
489
Duration
100 minutes
Passing Score
700/1000
Difficulty
AssociateLast Updated
Jan 2025
The Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate (SC-300) validates the ability to design, implement, and operate an organization's identity and access management using Microsoft Entra ID. Certified professionals configure and manage identities throughout their full lifecycles — covering users, devices, Azure resources, and applications — while enforcing Zero Trust principles across all identity and access solutions. The exam was last updated on November 7, 2025, reflecting current tooling including Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync, Global Secure Access, and Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps integration.
The certification spans four core competency areas: managing user identities and hybrid identity configurations (including Microsoft Entra Connect Sync and pass-through authentication), implementing authentication mechanisms and Conditional Access policies, managing workload and application identities such as managed identities and service principals, and governing access through entitlement management, Privileged Identity Management (PIM), and access reviews. Proficiency with PowerShell, Kusto Query Language (KQL), and Microsoft Entra admin center tooling is expected.
This certification is designed for IT professionals working as Identity Administrators, Security Engineers, or Enterprise Security Specialists who are responsible for identity infrastructure in Microsoft-centric environments. Candidates typically have hands-on experience administering Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD), Microsoft 365, and Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS), and work closely with security, network, and application teams.
It is also well-suited for cloud architects or security professionals looking to formalize their expertise in identity governance, hybrid identity solutions, and Zero Trust implementation. Those aiming to progress toward advanced certifications such as the Cybersecurity Architect Expert (SC-100) or Azure Security Engineer Associate (AZ-500) often pursue SC-300 as a foundational step.
Microsoft does not enforce formal prerequisites for SC-300, but candidates are expected to have practical experience with Microsoft Entra ID, Azure services, and Microsoft 365 workloads. Familiarity with Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) and core identity concepts — such as authentication protocols, federation, and directory synchronization — is strongly recommended before attempting the exam.
Candidates should also be comfortable using PowerShell for automation tasks and Kusto Query Language (KQL) for querying Azure Monitor and Log Analytics. Hands-on experience configuring Conditional Access policies, MFA, and identity governance features will significantly aid exam performance. Microsoft's free SC-300 learning path on Microsoft Learn and the official instructor-led course SC-300T00-A are the primary recommended preparation resources.
Exam SC-300 is a proctored assessment with a 100-minute time limit, delivered through Pearson VUE either online or at a testing center. The exam contains approximately 40–60 questions, which may include multiple-choice, drag-and-drop, case studies, and interactive lab-style components. Microsoft does not publicly disclose exact question counts, but community reports typically cite around 45–55 scored questions.
The passing score is 700 out of 1000. Scoring is not simply a percentage of correct answers — Microsoft uses a scaled scoring model. The exam is available in English, German, Spanish, French, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese (Brazil), Chinese (Simplified), and Chinese (Traditional). Candidates who test in a non-English language may request 30 additional minutes. The exam costs $165 USD (pricing varies by country/region). Microsoft offers a free Practice Assessment on Microsoft Learn (assessment ID 60) to help candidates gauge readiness before scheduling.
The SC-300 certification is directly applicable to Identity Administrator, Cloud Security Engineer, and IAM Specialist roles in organizations running Microsoft cloud or hybrid environments. According to PayScale data for 2026, IAM Administrators in the United States earn between $56,000 and $112,000 annually, with an average around $82,000. Job postings requiring SC-300 or equivalent Entra ID expertise frequently list salaries ranging from $79,600 to $143,300 depending on seniority, employer, and location. The certification is increasingly required or strongly preferred in enterprise security job postings, particularly in regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, and government.
SC-300 also serves as a natural stepping stone within the Microsoft security certification stack. It complements the Azure Security Engineer Associate (AZ-500) and Microsoft 365 Security Administrator Associate (MS-500), and is frequently cited as prerequisite experience for the Cybersecurity Architect Expert (SC-100). As organizations accelerate Zero Trust adoption and Microsoft Entra ID deployments, demand for certified identity professionals continues to grow — making this one of the more career-relevant associate-level security certifications in the Microsoft ecosystem.
5 sample questions with correct answers and explanations. Start a practice session to test yourself across all 489 questions.
1. CloudFirst Corp needs to implement an identity governance program that demonstrates compliance with regulatory requirements. What governance principle should drive their approach?
Explanation
A comprehensive governance framework that exceeds minimum regulatory requirements provides better long-term value by enabling continuous improvement, adapting to changing regulations, and demonstrating commitment to security. This approach builds stakeholder trust and reduces risk of non-compliance as requirements evolve.
2. An administrator at 'Globex Corporation' is configuring Azure AD Connect. They have set up OU filtering to only include the 'Sales' and 'Marketing' OUs. Additionally, they have configured synchronization to be filtered by a security group named 'CloudSyncGroup'. 'User1' is in the 'Sales' OU and is a direct member of 'CloudSyncGroup'. 'User2' is in the 'Marketing' OU and is a member of 'RegionalTeamGroup', which in turn is a member of 'CloudSyncGroup'. 'User3' is in the 'Finance' OU and is a direct member of 'CloudSyncGroup'. Which of these users will be synchronized to Azure AD?
Explanation
The correct answer is User1 only. Azure AD Connect applies filters sequentially. First, the OU filter is applied. Since the 'Finance' OU is not selected for synchronization, User3 is immediately excluded, regardless of their group membership. Next, the group-based filtering is applied to the remaining users. The group filtering feature in Azure AD Connect only synchronizes the direct members of the specified group. It does not process nested group memberships. Therefore, User1, who is a direct member of 'CloudSyncGroup' and is in a selected OU ('Sales'), will be synchronized. User2 is in a selected OU ('Marketing'), but is only an indirect (nested) member of 'CloudSyncGroup'. Because the filtering does not look at nested members, User2 will not be synchronized.
3. GlobalTech Inc. has applications that need to access Azure Key Vault secrets and want to implement secret rotation without application downtime. The applications run on Azure Kubernetes Service clusters. What identity and secret management approach should they implement?
Explanation
Azure Key Vault Provider for Secrets Store CSI Driver with user-assigned managed identities provides the most secure and scalable approach for secret management in Kubernetes. It enables automatic secret rotation, eliminates secrets stored in configuration files or environment variables, provides centralized secret management through Key Vault, and integrates seamlessly with managed identity authentication. This approach supports the zero-trust principle of assuming secrets may be compromised.
4. An organization's security policy states that access to files tagged as 'Confidential' is granted only to users who are in the 'Management' department AND are accessing from a 'Corporate-Managed' device. This is an example of which type of authorization model?
Explanation
This is an example of Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC). ABAC is a highly dynamic and granular authorization model where access decisions are made by evaluating rules against the attributes of the user, the resource being accessed, and the environment. In this case, the user's attribute is their department ('Management'), the resource's attribute is its tag ('Confidential'), and the environmental attribute is the device state ('Corporate-Managed'). Access is granted only when all these attribute-based conditions are met. RBAC is based solely on the user's role, not on these multiple, real-time attributes.
5. MultiNational Corp operates in several countries and needs to configure external collaboration settings for their Microsoft Entra tenant. They want to allow their employees to invite external partners for specific projects, but they want to control what external users can do once they're in the tenant. The security team wants guest users to have minimal permissions while still being able to collaborate effectively. What guest user access level provides the most restrictive permissions?
Explanation
The most restrictive guest user access level is 'Guest users access is restricted to properties and memberships of their own directory objects.' This setting provides the minimum necessary permissions for guest users to function - they can only view and manage their own profile information and see their own group memberships, but cannot browse other users, groups, or directory objects. This setting follows the principle of least privilege while still allowing guests to participate in collaboration scenarios. The setting where guests have the same access as members provides too many permissions and defeats the purpose of having guest accounts. Limited access to directory properties is less restrictive than the most minimal setting. While having no access at all might seem most secure, it would prevent guests from functioning effectively in collaborative scenarios where they need to at least manage their own profile information.
One-time access to this exam