Microsoft · GH-300
Validates your ability to use GitHub Copilot to optimize software development workflows, craft prompts, implement responsible AI practices, and configure privacy and security settings.
Practice Questions
352
≈ 7 practice exams
Duration
100 minutes
Passing Score
Not publicly disclosed
Difficulty
IntermediateLast Updated
Jan 2025
Use this GH-300 practice exam to prepare for GitHub Copilot (GH-300) with realistic questions, detailed explanations, and focused study modes. The practice bank includes 352 questions for Microsoft GH-300, so you can review the exam steadily instead of relying on one long cram session.
As you practice, pay extra attention to recurring topics such as Responsible AI, GitHub Copilot Plans and Features, How GitHub Copilot Works and Handles Data, Prompt Crafting and Engineering, and Developer Use Cases for AI. Start with short sessions to identify weak areas, then move into timed quizzes once your accuracy is consistent.
The explanations are especially useful when you want to connect exam wording to the responsibilities and scenarios described in the official certification guidance. Use the free preview first, then unlock the full question bank when you are ready to build a complete study routine.
The GitHub Copilot certification (GH-300) is an intermediate-level credential issued by GitHub/Microsoft that validates a candidate's ability to use GitHub Copilot effectively across the full software development lifecycle. The exam covers AI-assisted code generation, refactoring, documentation, and testing using GitHub Copilot's suite of tools — including inline suggestions, Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, Agent Mode, Edit Mode, and Model Context Protocol (MCP) integrations. It also assesses understanding of how Copilot processes and transmits data, including prompt building, proxy filtering, and post-processing of suggestions.
The certification was significantly updated in January 2026 to reflect the rapid evolution of GitHub Copilot's feature set, including new objectives around Agent Sessions, Sub-Agents, Spaces, Spark, and customizable review standards via instruction files. It is valid for two years from the date earned, after which holders can renew by passing a free online assessment on Microsoft Learn. The exam is delivered in English, Spanish, Portuguese (Brazil), Korean, and Japanese through Pearson VUE, with proctored online or in-person delivery options.
The GH-300 is designed for software developers, DevOps engineers, app makers, and technology managers who use or oversee GitHub Copilot in professional development environments. Candidates are expected to have hands-on experience with at least one programming language and a working familiarity with GitHub fundamentals such as repositories, pull requests, and GitHub Actions.
The certification is particularly relevant for developers looking to formalize their AI-assisted development skills, team leads responsible for rolling out Copilot across engineering organizations, and enterprise administrators who configure organization-wide Copilot policies, content exclusions, and audit logging. It is not an entry-level exam — candidates should already be comfortable using an IDE and have some exposure to GitHub Copilot before attempting the certification.
There are no formal prerequisites required to register for the GH-300 exam. However, Microsoft recommends that candidates have familiarity with GitHub fundamentals and practical experience with one or more programming languages before attempting the exam.
Recommended preparation includes completing the official Microsoft Learn learning paths — 'GitHub Copilot Fundamentals Part 1' and 'GitHub Copilot Fundamentals Part 2' — and the instructor-led course GH-300T00-A (a one-day intermediate course). Candidates should also review the official GitHub documentation on Copilot plans, data handling, prompt engineering, and privacy/content exclusion configuration. Prior exposure to responsible AI concepts, such as identifying risks and mitigation strategies for generative AI tools, is strongly recommended given the 15–20% exam weight on that domain.
The GH-300 exam is 100 minutes in duration and delivered through Pearson VUE as a proctored assessment. The exam may include interactive components in addition to traditional question types. The exact number of questions is not publicly disclosed by Microsoft, though the format is consistent with other GitHub certifications. A score of 700 or greater (on a scale that Microsoft does not publicly define as a fixed number of questions) is required to pass.
The exam is available online (remotely proctored) or at in-person Pearson VUE test centers. If a candidate fails, they must wait 24 hours before retaking; subsequent retake waiting periods vary per Microsoft's retake policy. An exam sandbox is available at GHCertDemo.starttest.com so candidates can preview the interface and question types before test day. Accommodations for extra time or assistive devices can be requested through Microsoft's credentials support portal.
The GH-300 certification signals to employers that a developer can responsibly and effectively leverage GitHub Copilot — a tool now used by over 15 million developers and deployed across 90% of Fortune 100 companies. Certified professionals are positioned for roles such as software engineer, DevOps engineer, AI-augmented developer, and technology manager in organizations actively scaling AI-assisted development practices. According to GitHub's own certification impact data, 79% of certified employees produce higher quality work, 70% demonstrate improved productivity, and 32% report salary increases following certification.
Unlike cloud platform certifications (AWS, Azure) which focus on infrastructure, GH-300 is one of the few vendor-backed credentials specifically validating AI coding assistant proficiency — making it complementary rather than competitive with existing developer certifications. As AI pair programming becomes standard practice in enterprise engineering teams, this certification differentiates candidates in hiring, promotion, and consulting contexts, particularly for roles that involve onboarding teams onto Copilot, configuring enterprise Copilot policies, or advocating for responsible AI practices within engineering organizations.
5 sample questions with answers and explanations. The full bank has 352 questions, enough for 7 full-length practice exams.
Preview — answers shown1. EducationTech implements an AI proctoring system for online exams that monitors student behavior through webcams and microphones. The system flags students for suspicious activity and can automatically terminate exams. Students with disabilities, different cultural backgrounds, or non-standard testing environments experience higher false positive rates. The system provides no explanation for flagging decisions. Which principles are being violated? (Select two)
Multiple correct answersExplanation
This scenario violates Inclusiveness because the system disadvantages students with disabilities, different cultural backgrounds, or non-standard environments, failing to accommodate diverse student needs and circumstances. It also violates Transparency because students receive no explanation for why they were flagged, preventing them from understanding or challenging automated decisions that affect their academic standing. Educational AI systems must be designed to work equitably for all students and provide clear explanations for decisions that impact academic outcomes.
2. A Quality Assurance engineer at Digital Solutions Inc. is responsible for testing a new REST API but has limited experience writing test scripts in JavaScript. They need to create a script that sends a POST request to an endpoint and asserts the HTTP status code is 201. How can GitHub Copilot most effectively assist them in this task?
Explanation
GitHub Copilot excels at generating code from natural language prompts. The QA engineer can simply describe the test case they need in plain English, and Copilot will generate the necessary JavaScript code, including the API call and the assertion. This empowers team members who are not expert coders to contribute to the testing effort effectively. The other options describe tasks that are outside the core function of a code generation assistant.
3. TravelAI develops an AI recommendation engine for booking flights and hotels. The system learns from user behavior and preferences to make personalized suggestions. Analysis reveals the AI consistently recommends more expensive options to users from certain postal codes and shows different availability for identical searches based on user profiles. The pricing and availability differences cannot be explained by the AI system. Which principles are being violated? (Select two)
Multiple correct answersExplanation
This scenario violates Fairness because the system provides different pricing and availability based on user location and profiles, which can constitute discriminatory practices. It also violates Transparency because the AI cannot explain why different users see different options for identical searches, preventing users from understanding potentially discriminatory treatment. Travel recommendation systems should provide equal access to options and pricing while being transparent about how recommendations are generated. Users have a right to understand why they're seeing certain prices and availability.
4. StartupTech's development team wants to maximize their return on investment from GitHub Copilot by identifying the specific workflow areas where it provides the most value. A technical lead needs to prioritize which development activities to focus Copilot usage on. Which development workflow areas typically see the most significant efficiency improvements from GitHub Copilot usage? (Select two)
Multiple correct answersExplanation
The most significant efficiency improvements typically occur in writing comprehensive unit tests and test case generation (where Copilot can suggest test cases, create test data, and identify edge cases) and generating boilerplate code and implementing common design patterns (where Copilot excels at routine implementation tasks). These areas align with Copilot's strengths in code generation and pattern recognition while addressing time-consuming but necessary development tasks. The other options represent activities outside Copilot's core capabilities or areas where human expertise and judgment remain essential.
5. CloudInfra Ltd.'s DevOps team wants to understand GitHub Copilot's agent capabilities for infrastructure automation. A developer is creating deployment scripts and needs help generating Docker configurations that account for the project's specific dependencies, environment variables, and service architecture. Which agent approach would provide the most relevant assistance?
Explanation
The @workspace agent is most appropriate for Docker configuration because containerization requires understanding the complete project dependencies, architecture, environment requirements, and service interactions. The @workspace agent can analyze the entire project to determine what needs to be included in the container, identify all dependencies, understand environment variable requirements, and create Docker configurations that properly package the entire application. This comprehensive project understanding is essential for effective containerization.
GitHub Actions (GH-200)
GH-200 · 310 questions
GitHub Administration (GH-100)
GH-100 · 447 questions
GitHub Advanced Security (GH-500)
GH-500 · 299 questions
Microsoft Certified: Identity and Access Administrator Associate (SC-300)
SC-300 · 489 questions
Microsoft Certified: Fabric Analytics Engineer Associate (DP-600)
DP-600 · 792 questions
Microsoft 365 Certified: Teams Administrator Associate (MS-700)
MS-700 · 569 questions
$17.99
One-time access to this exam