EC-Council · ECIH
Validates competency across all stages of incident handling and response, including preparation, incident recording, triage, containment, evidence gathering, forensic analysis, eradication, recovery, and post-incident activities for network security incidents, malicious code incidents, and insider threats.
Practice Questions
590
≈ 4 practice exams
Duration
180 minutes
Passing Score
70%
Difficulty
AssociateLast Updated
Feb 2026
Use this ECIH practice exam to prepare for EC-Council Certified Incident Handler (ECIH) with realistic questions, detailed explanations, and focused study modes. The practice bank includes 590 questions for EC-Council ECIH, so you can review the exam steadily instead of relying on one long cram session.
As you practice, pay extra attention to patterns in your missed answers. Start with short sessions to identify weak areas, then move into timed quizzes once your accuracy is consistent.
The explanations are especially useful when you want to connect exam wording to the responsibilities and scenarios described in the official certification guidance. Use the free preview first, then unlock the full question bank when you are ready to build a complete study routine.
The EC-Council Certified Incident Handler (ECIH) is a specialist-level certification that validates a cybersecurity professional's ability to manage the complete lifecycle of security incident handling and response. Carrying exam code 212-89, the ECIH program covers all phases of the incident response process—from preparation and initial triage through containment, forensic evidence gathering, eradication, system recovery, and post-incident review. The curriculum addresses a wide range of incident categories, including network security incidents, malicious code and malware outbreaks, email security incidents, web application attacks, cloud security incidents, endpoint compromises, and insider threats.
Accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and approved by the American Council on Education (ACE), the ECIH is recognized as a rigorous, academically vetted credential. The program exposes candidates to over 800 incident handling and response tools and more than 95 hands-on labs, emphasizing practical, method-driven competency over theoretical knowledge alone. The current version (v3) reflects the evolving threat landscape, incorporating modern attack vectors such as cloud-based incidents and advanced persistent threats.
The ECIH is designed for cybersecurity professionals who are directly involved in detecting, analyzing, or responding to security incidents. Primary target roles include incident response team members, SOC (Security Operations Center) analysts, cyber forensic investigators, vulnerability assessment auditors, penetration testers, and risk assessment administrators. System administrators, network managers, firewall administrators, and IT managers responsible for organizational security posture are also well-suited candidates.
The certification is appropriate for professionals with at least one year of experience in cybersecurity who want to formalize and deepen their incident handling expertise. It is also pursued by federal employees and defense contractors seeking to meet compliance or role-specific requirements in government and regulated industry environments.
EC-Council recommends that candidates have at least one year of experience working as a cybersecurity professional before attempting the ECIH exam. This foundational experience ensures familiarity with networking concepts, operating systems, common attack vectors, and basic security tooling—all of which are assumed knowledge within the curriculum.
There are no mandatory formal educational prerequisites, but a working understanding of TCP/IP networking, Windows and Linux system administration, log analysis, and basic digital forensics concepts will significantly aid comprehension of the course material. Candidates with prior exposure to security frameworks such as NIST SP 800-61 or SANS incident response methodology will find the structured approach of the ECIH program familiar. EC-Council also requires candidates to complete an eligibility application if they are challenging the exam without attending official training.
The ECIH exam (code 212-89) consists of 100 multiple-choice questions and must be completed within 3 hours (180 minutes). The exam is delivered through EC-Council's ECC Exam Center or at Pearson VUE testing centers worldwide, offering both online proctored and in-person options.
EC-Council uses a variable cut-score methodology based on the specific exam form administered. While the generally cited passing score is 70%, cut scores can range from 60% to 85% depending on the difficulty calibration of the form assigned to the candidate—this is determined through psychometric analysis and subject matter expert review during beta testing. There are no separate unscored pilot questions disclosed publicly. Certification must be renewed every three years through EC-Council's continuing education program.
The ECIH certification positions holders for roles such as Incident Responder, SOC Analyst (Tier 2/3), Cyber Forensic Analyst, Threat Intelligence Analyst, and Information Security Manager. In the United States, incident handlers and response professionals earn an average salary of approximately $96,000 per year, with ranges typically between $85,000 and $108,000 depending on experience, industry, and location—with government, defense, and financial services sectors commanding premium compensation.
Compared to alternatives like the SANS GIAC Certified Incident Handler (GCIH), the ECIH is more accessible in terms of cost and entry requirements, making it a practical stepping stone for professionals earlier in their security careers. The ANSI accreditation and ACE approval add credibility recognized by government agencies and academic institutions. For professionals targeting compliance-heavy industries or federal positions, the ECIH also aligns with the NICE Cybersecurity Workforce Framework's 'Protect and Defend' work role category, broadening its applicability in government contracting environments.
5 sample questions with answers and explanations. The full bank has 590 questions, enough for 4 full-length practice exams.
Preview — answers shown1. A malware analyst examines a sophisticated rootkit that uses Direct Kernel Object Manipulation to hide processes from standard enumeration tools. The analyst runs Volatility's pslist plugin but the malicious process does not appear. Which two Volatility plugins should the analyst use to detect this DKOM-based process hiding? (Select two!)
Multiple correct answersExplanation
The psscan plugin uses pool tag scanning to locate EPROCESS structures directly in memory rather than following the ActiveProcessLinks list that DKOM rootkits manipulate. The psxview plugin cross-references results from multiple process enumeration methods including pslist, psscan, thrdproc, pspcid, csrss, session, and deskthrd to identify discrepancies that indicate DKOM hiding. Processes visible in some methods but not others reveal hidden processes. The netscan plugin identifies network connections but does not specifically detect hidden processes. Malfind detects code injection but not DKOM process hiding. The dlllist plugin enumerates DLLs for known processes but cannot find processes already hidden by DKOM.
2. A forensic analyst performs static malware analysis using multiple tools. The analyst extracts strings from a suspicious executable and identifies base64-encoded PowerShell commands. Which tool is specifically designed for extracting obfuscated and encoded strings from malware that standard strings utilities might miss? (Select one!)
Explanation
FLOSS (FireEye Labs Obfuscated String Solver) is specifically designed to extract obfuscated strings, including stack strings, encoded strings, and strings hidden through various obfuscation techniques that standard string extraction tools miss. It uses static analysis and emulation to decode strings that malware authors intentionally hide. BinText is a simple string extraction tool without deobfuscation capabilities. Pestudio is a comprehensive PE analysis tool but focuses on file structure analysis rather than advanced string deobfuscation. The standard strings utility only extracts plaintext ASCII and Unicode strings visible in the binary without any decoding or deobfuscation.
3. An organization experiences a volumetric DDoS attack overwhelming their internet connection with 85 Gbps of UDP flood traffic. Network monitoring shows millions of packets per second saturating bandwidth. Which DDoS mitigation technique is most effective for this attack type? (Select one!)
Explanation
Cloud-based DDoS scrubbing centers are most effective for volumetric attacks by filtering malicious traffic upstream before it reaches the organization's internet connection. Scrubbing centers have massive bandwidth capacity to absorb and filter multi-gigabit attacks. On-premises rate limiting cannot help when the internet pipe is already saturated. WAF addresses application-layer attacks, not volumetric UDP floods. Internal IPS is unreachable when bandwidth is exhausted.
4. An organization implements Traffic Light Protocol (TLP) for threat intelligence sharing. A CSIRT receives threat indicators marked as TLP:AMBER+STRICT. Which sharing restriction applies to this classification? (Select one!)
Explanation
TLP:AMBER+STRICT indicates information is restricted to the recipient organization only and must not be shared with external parties including partners, suppliers, or other organizations. This classification is stricter than TLP:AMBER (which allows limited sharing with need-to-know parties) and is used when intelligence contains sensitive details requiring organization-only distribution. TLP:CLEAR allows unlimited disclosure. TLP:GREEN permits community-wide sharing. TLP:AMBER allows limited sharing beyond the organization. TLP:RED restricts to individual recipients. TLP:AMBER+STRICT specifically enforces organizational boundaries without external sharing under any circumstances.
5. An organization implements the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 for its incident response program. Which function was newly added in version 2.0 to address organizational context and priorities before implementing other cybersecurity activities? (Select one!)
Explanation
The GOVERN function is new in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and establishes organizational context, cybersecurity strategy, expectations, and policy before implementing other functions. It addresses cybersecurity governance, risk management strategy, roles and responsibilities, and oversight. The IDENTIFY function existed in CSF 1.0 and focuses on asset management and risk assessment. The RESPOND function existed in CSF 1.0 for incident response activities. The PROTECT function existed in CSF 1.0 for implementing protective safeguards. GOVERN was added to emphasize that effective cybersecurity begins with organizational governance and strategic alignment.
Digital Forensics Essentials (DFE)
DFE · 626 questions
EC-Council Certified Disaster Recovery Professional (EDRP)
EDRP · 623 questions
Certified Application Security Engineer .NET (CASE-.NET)
CASE-.NET · 625 questions
EC-Council Certified Encryption Specialist (ECES)
ECES · 627 questions
Ethical Hacking Essentials (EHE)
EHE · 627 questions
ICS/SCADA Cybersecurity
ICS-SCADA · 627 questions
$17.99
One-time access to this exam