EC-Council · ECIH
Validates competency across all stages of incident handling and response, including preparation, incident recording, triage, containment, evidence gathering, forensic analysis, eradication, recovery, and post-incident activities for network security incidents, malicious code incidents, and insider threats.
Practice Questions
590
≈ 4 practice exams
Duration
180 minutes
Passing Score
70%
Difficulty
AssociateLast Updated
Feb 2026
Use this ECIH practice exam to prepare for EC-Council Certified Incident Handler (ECIH) with realistic questions, detailed explanations, and focused study modes. The practice bank includes 590 questions for EC-Council ECIH, so you can review the exam steadily instead of relying on one long cram session.
As you practice, pay extra attention to patterns in your missed answers. Start with short sessions to identify weak areas, then move into timed quizzes once your accuracy is consistent.
The explanations are especially useful when you want to connect exam wording to the responsibilities and scenarios described in the official certification guidance. Use the free preview first, then unlock the full question bank when you are ready to build a complete study routine.
The EC-Council Certified Incident Handler (ECIH) is a specialist-level certification that validates a cybersecurity professional's ability to manage the complete lifecycle of security incident handling and response. Carrying exam code 212-89, the ECIH program covers all phases of the incident response process—from preparation and initial triage through containment, forensic evidence gathering, eradication, system recovery, and post-incident review. The curriculum addresses a wide range of incident categories, including network security incidents, malicious code and malware outbreaks, email security incidents, web application attacks, cloud security incidents, endpoint compromises, and insider threats.
Accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and approved by the American Council on Education (ACE), the ECIH is recognized as a rigorous, academically vetted credential. The program exposes candidates to over 800 incident handling and response tools and more than 95 hands-on labs, emphasizing practical, method-driven competency over theoretical knowledge alone. The current version (v3) reflects the evolving threat landscape, incorporating modern attack vectors such as cloud-based incidents and advanced persistent threats.
The ECIH is designed for cybersecurity professionals who are directly involved in detecting, analyzing, or responding to security incidents. Primary target roles include incident response team members, SOC (Security Operations Center) analysts, cyber forensic investigators, vulnerability assessment auditors, penetration testers, and risk assessment administrators. System administrators, network managers, firewall administrators, and IT managers responsible for organizational security posture are also well-suited candidates.
The certification is appropriate for professionals with at least one year of experience in cybersecurity who want to formalize and deepen their incident handling expertise. It is also pursued by federal employees and defense contractors seeking to meet compliance or role-specific requirements in government and regulated industry environments.
EC-Council recommends that candidates have at least one year of experience working as a cybersecurity professional before attempting the ECIH exam. This foundational experience ensures familiarity with networking concepts, operating systems, common attack vectors, and basic security tooling—all of which are assumed knowledge within the curriculum.
There are no mandatory formal educational prerequisites, but a working understanding of TCP/IP networking, Windows and Linux system administration, log analysis, and basic digital forensics concepts will significantly aid comprehension of the course material. Candidates with prior exposure to security frameworks such as NIST SP 800-61 or SANS incident response methodology will find the structured approach of the ECIH program familiar. EC-Council also requires candidates to complete an eligibility application if they are challenging the exam without attending official training.
The ECIH exam (code 212-89) consists of 100 multiple-choice questions and must be completed within 3 hours (180 minutes). The exam is delivered through EC-Council's ECC Exam Center or at Pearson VUE testing centers worldwide, offering both online proctored and in-person options.
EC-Council uses a variable cut-score methodology based on the specific exam form administered. While the generally cited passing score is 70%, cut scores can range from 60% to 85% depending on the difficulty calibration of the form assigned to the candidate—this is determined through psychometric analysis and subject matter expert review during beta testing. There are no separate unscored pilot questions disclosed publicly. Certification must be renewed every three years through EC-Council's continuing education program.
The ECIH certification positions holders for roles such as Incident Responder, SOC Analyst (Tier 2/3), Cyber Forensic Analyst, Threat Intelligence Analyst, and Information Security Manager. In the United States, incident handlers and response professionals earn an average salary of approximately $96,000 per year, with ranges typically between $85,000 and $108,000 depending on experience, industry, and location—with government, defense, and financial services sectors commanding premium compensation.
Compared to alternatives like the SANS GIAC Certified Incident Handler (GCIH), the ECIH is more accessible in terms of cost and entry requirements, making it a practical stepping stone for professionals earlier in their security careers. The ANSI accreditation and ACE approval add credibility recognized by government agencies and academic institutions. For professionals targeting compliance-heavy industries or federal positions, the ECIH also aligns with the NICE Cybersecurity Workforce Framework's 'Protect and Defend' work role category, broadening its applicability in government contracting environments.
5 sample questions with answers and explanations. The full bank has 590 questions, enough for 4 full-length practice exams.
Preview — answers shown1. A CSIRT leader must select an appropriate team staffing model for a mid-sized organization with limited internal security expertise and budget constraints for a 24/7 security operations center. The organization requires incident response capabilities but cannot justify hiring a full internal team. Which staffing model provides the best balance of cost-effectiveness and capability for this scenario? (Select one!)
Explanation
CSIRT staffing models must align with organizational resources and requirements. The Partially Outsourced model combines internal staff for incident coordination, organizational knowledge, and decision-making with external Managed Security Service Provider capabilities for 24/7 monitoring, advanced analysis, and specialized expertise. This model provides cost-effective access to experienced incident handlers without the expense of maintaining a full internal team, while retaining internal control over response decisions and organizational context. The Fully Insourced model requires significant investment in hiring, training, and retaining specialized staff for 24/7 coverage, which exceeds the stated budget constraints and available expertise. The Fully Outsourced model transfers all incident response to external vendors, which may reduce costs but loses internal organizational knowledge and control over critical security decisions. The Hybrid geographically distributed model still requires multiple full internal teams across time zones, representing even higher costs than single-location insourced models. Organizations with limited resources typically benefit most from partially outsourced models that leverage external expertise while maintaining internal oversight.
2. During forensic imaging, an incident handler uses the dd command to acquire a 2TB hard drive. Midway through imaging, the source disk encounters bad sectors causing read errors. The handler did not use the conv=noerror,sync flags. What is the consequence? (Select one!)
Explanation
Without the conv=noerror flag, dd terminates immediately upon encountering read errors, producing only a partial image up to the point of failure. The conv=noerror flag instructs dd to continue despite errors, while conv=sync pads error blocks with zeros to maintain proper data alignment and image structure. Without these flags, forensic acquisition fails and must be restarted. The dd command does not automatically handle errors or skip sectors intelligently without explicit parameters. Metadata about bad sector locations requires enhanced tools like dcfldd with hashlog features.
3. An incident handler analyzes STIX 2.1 threat intelligence data received via TAXII from an industry ISAC. The data contains multiple Domain Objects describing a campaign. Which STIX Relationship Object (SRO) would link a Threat Actor SDO to the Attack Pattern SDO they employed? (Select one!)
Explanation
Relationship objects are specifically designed to link STIX Domain Objects (SDOs) using defined relationship types. The relationship_type of uses indicates that a Threat Actor uses a particular Attack Pattern, Malware, or Tool. Sighting objects document observed instances of indicators or threat activity, not relationships between actors and patterns. Observed Data contains cyber observables like IP addresses or file hashes, not relationships. Campaign is an SDO that represents coordinated activities but does not directly link threat actors to attack patterns as a relationship mechanism.
4. An organization suffers a ransomware attack encrypting production databases. The incident response team isolates affected systems and begins recovery planning. The attacker demands 50 Bitcoin payment and threatens to publish stolen data. The organization has backups from 8 hours ago and can recover within 12 hours. Which action should the incident handler recommend? (Select one!)
Explanation
Checking No More Ransom Project for free decryptors followed by backup restoration is correct because the organization has viable recovery options that make payment unnecessary. The 8-hour old backups and 12-hour recovery time provide acceptable RPO and RTO. Payment does not guarantee decryption or prevent data publication, and funds criminal operations. Law enforcement should be contacted immediately, not after payment. Negotiating with attackers wastes time and does not address the underlying issue. When functional backups exist, organizations should restore from backups while pursuing free decryption tools and reporting to authorities. Payment should only be considered when data is unrecoverable and business-critical, which is not the case here.
5. A CSIRT implements the SANS PICERL incident handling model. After containing a ransomware incident by isolating affected systems, the team discovers the threat actors maintained persistence through a kernel-mode rootkit that survived initial eradication efforts. According to PICERL, which phase should the team return to? (Select one!)
Explanation
The team should continue in the Eradication phase using specialized rootkit removal tools to eliminate all malicious components. SANS PICERL separates Eradication as a distinct phase focused on removing threats from the environment. Returning to Identification would only document what is already known. Returning to Containment is unnecessary as systems are already isolated. Proceeding to Recovery before complete eradication risks reinfection. The rootkit must be fully eradicated before recovery begins.
Digital Forensics Essentials (DFE)
DFE · 626 questions
EC-Council Certified Disaster Recovery Professional (EDRP)
EDRP · 623 questions
Certified Application Security Engineer .NET (CASE-.NET)
CASE-.NET · 625 questions
EC-Council Certified Encryption Specialist (ECES)
ECES · 627 questions
Ethical Hacking Essentials (EHE)
EHE · 627 questions
ICS/SCADA Cybersecurity
ICS-SCADA · 627 questions
$17.99
One-time access to this exam