EC-Council · CEI
Validates instructional competency to deliver EC-Council certification training programs, covering instructor credibility, learning environment management, effective communication and questioning techniques, instructional methods and media, and learner performance evaluation.
Practice Questions
611
≈ 4 practice exams
Duration
120 minutes
Passing Score
70%
Difficulty
ProfessionalLast Updated
Feb 2026
Use this CEI practice exam to prepare for Certified EC-Council Instructor (CEI) with realistic questions, detailed explanations, and focused study modes. The practice bank includes 611 questions for EC-Council CEI, so you can review the exam steadily instead of relying on one long cram session.
As you practice, pay extra attention to patterns in your missed answers. Start with short sessions to identify weak areas, then move into timed quizzes once your accuracy is consistent.
The explanations are especially useful when you want to connect exam wording to the responsibilities and scenarios described in the official certification guidance. Use the free preview first, then unlock the full question bank when you are ready to build a complete study routine.
The Certified EC-Council Instructor (C|EI) certification, associated with exam code 312-75, is EC-Council's credential for professionals who wish to become authorized instructors delivering EC-Council's suite of cybersecurity certification programs — including CEH, CHFI, ECSA, LPT, CND, and others. The certification validates that a candidate possesses the pedagogical skills required to effectively teach technical security content to adult learners, covering core instructional competencies such as establishing credibility, managing the learning environment, delivering presentations, applying questioning techniques, and evaluating learner performance.
The C|EI program is built around adult learning principles and instructional design methodology, ensuring that certified instructors can adapt EC-Council's standardized course materials to diverse learner audiences. Earning the C|EI credential is a gateway to becoming an EC-Council Subject Matter Expert (SME), a designation reserved for professionals who contribute to curriculum development and deliver authoritative training content within the EC-Council ecosystem. Only individuals who meet stringent application and exam requirements are granted C|EI status, reflecting EC-Council's commitment to quality instruction across its Accredited Training Center (ATC) network.
The C|EI is designed for experienced cybersecurity professionals and trainers who wish to deliver official EC-Council certification courses through authorized training channels. Ideal candidates include independent security trainers, corporate training managers, academic instructors at technical institutions, and staff at EC-Council Accredited Training Centers (ATCs) who are already certified in the EC-Council program they intend to teach — for example, a Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH) who wants to train others toward the CEH credential.
Candidates should have an established background in hands-on security work and a demonstrated training or teaching history. This certification is not suited for entry-level professionals; it targets individuals with meaningful industry experience who are ready to transition into or formalize a role as a professional cybersecurity educator within the EC-Council framework.
Applicants must hold an active, current EC-Council certification in each program they intend to teach — for instance, candidates wishing to instruct CEH courses must themselves hold a valid CEH credential. All EC-Council certifications must be in good standing, with Continuing Education (ECE) credits kept current through the EC-Council Aspen Portal.
Candidates who do not already hold instructor credentials from another recognized body (such as CompTIA CTT+, Microsoft MCT, Cisco, PECB, Oracle, or VMware) must submit an experience letter on official organizational letterhead demonstrating a minimum of two years of active training or teaching involvement. Additionally, applicants must secure an endorsement from an EC-Council Accredited Training Center (ATC), though EC-Council may endorse the application at its own discretion if no ATC sponsor is available. Technical hands-on expertise with security technologies is also expected.
The CEI exam (312-75) consists of 50 multiple-choice questions and must be completed within 120 minutes. The exam is delivered through EC-Council's official exam portal (ECC Exam Center). Candidates must achieve a passing score of 70% to earn the certification.
The exam is scenario-based in nature, testing practical knowledge of instructional delivery rather than purely technical security content. It assesses a candidate's understanding of adult learning principles, instructional design, classroom management, and communication techniques in the context of delivering EC-Council certification courseware. No unscored or survey questions have been publicly documented for this exam.
Earning the C|EI credential authorizes professionals to deliver EC-Council's globally recognized cybersecurity certification programs — including the Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH), Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (CHFI), Certified Network Defender (CND), and EC-Council Certified Security Analyst (ECSA) — through the worldwide ATC network. This opens direct revenue opportunities as an authorized trainer, with cybersecurity instructor rates typically ranging from $1,000 to $3,000+ per training day depending on geography and specialization. Certified instructors also gain access to EC-Council's secured instructor resource portal, which includes up-to-date presentation materials, lab environments, and course videos.
Beyond direct training income, the C|EI designation enhances professional credibility within the cybersecurity education sector, differentiating holders from uncredentialed trainers when competing for corporate training contracts or academic positions. C|EI holders may also be considered for EC-Council's Subject Matter Expert (SME) program, contributing to curriculum development and exam authoring. As demand for skilled cybersecurity professionals — and the training programs that produce them — continues to grow globally, the C|EI credential positions holders at the intersection of technical expertise and professional instruction.
5 sample questions with answers and explanations. The full bank has 611 questions, enough for 4 full-length practice exams.
Preview — answers shown1. An EC-Council ATC has three instructors: Sarah holds CEI and active CEH certification with current ECE credits, Tom holds CEI and active CHFI certification but is 15 ECE credits short for the year, and Linda holds active CEH certification but no CEI. The ATC wants to offer a 5-day CEH bootcamp next month. According to EC-Council policies, which instructor(s) are authorized to deliver this course? (Select one!)
Explanation
EC-Council CEI authorization requires all three conditions: active CEI certification, active EC-Council certification in the specific program being taught, and current ECE credits maintained through the Delta Portal. Sarah meets all requirements with CEI, active CEH, and current ECE credits. Tom holds CEI but lacks current ECE credits, which means his certification may be suspended or at risk. Linda holds CEH certification but lacks CEI certification, disqualifying her from instructing. Only Sarah is fully authorized to deliver the CEH course.
2. During a CEH module on SQL injection, an instructor asks students: "What assumptions are we making when we say parameterized queries always prevent SQL injection?" This question exemplifies which category of Socratic questioning? (Select one!)
Explanation
Probing assumptions in Socratic questioning examines the underlying beliefs, presuppositions, and assumptions in statements or positions. Asking what assumptions underlie a security claim directly targets this category by challenging students to examine what they're taking for granted. Clarifying questions seek basic understanding of meaning. Seeking evidence requests data or reasoning supporting a conclusion. Questions about implications explore consequences of ideas. The question specifically uses the word assumptions and challenges students to examine underlying beliefs about parameterized query effectiveness.
3. During a CEH practical examination, a student successfully achieves the required security objective of preventing unauthorized access to a web server. However, the student configured iptables firewall rules instead of using the AWS Security Groups method taught in class. The configuration follows industry best practices and effectively blocks all unauthorized traffic. How should the instructor evaluate this performance according to adult learning principles? (Select one!)
Explanation
Adult learning theory recognizes that experienced learners bring valuable prior knowledge and problem-solving approaches. When assessment is criterion-referenced and measures achievement of security outcomes, the specific technical path matters less than demonstrating competency. Achieving the security objective using industry-standard iptables rules shows deeper understanding and ability to transfer learning across technologies. Assigning zero points violates the principle that adults are problem-centered rather than subject-centered, focusing on outcomes over prescribed methods. Partial credit inappropriately penalizes valid alternative solutions when the learning objective specified a security outcome rather than a specific procedural method. Requiring repetition treats adults as dependent learners rather than self-directed professionals capable of selecting appropriate tools. This approach would only be justified if the learning objective specifically required demonstrating AWS Security Groups proficiency rather than achieving a security outcome.
4. An instructor teaching a cybersecurity ethics module wants to help students connect the material to their professional growth and personal values rather than relying on external rewards like grades. According to Self-Determination Theory, which psychological need is the instructor primarily addressing? (Select one!)
Explanation
Autonomy is the psychological need for control over one's behavior and intrinsic motivation rather than external rewards. By focusing on professional growth and personal values instead of grades, the instructor addresses the autonomy need, allowing students to find internal meaning. Competence focuses on feeling capable and effective through skill-building and feedback. Relatedness involves connection to others through collaboration. Self-actualization is from Maslow's Hierarchy, not Self-Determination Theory, which focuses on autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
5. A CEI instructor holds active CEH, CHFI, and ECSA certifications. The instructor's three-year certification period began January 1, 2023, and ends December 31, 2025. As of December 15, 2025, the instructor has earned 115 ECE credits total across the three years but only 15 credits in 2025. What consequence will the instructor face? (Select one!)
Explanation
EC-Council CEI requirements mandate 120 ECE credits every three years with a minimum of 20 credits per year. While the instructor met the 120 total credit requirement, they failed to meet the annual minimum of 20 credits in 2025 (only earning 15). This results in certification suspension for one year. Meeting the total 120 credits does not waive the annual minimum requirement. Immediate revocation only occurs if the instructor fails during the suspension period. EC-Council does not provide grace periods for ECE credit shortfalls.
Certified Threat Intelligence Analyst (CTIA)
CTIA · 740 questions
Certified Chief Information Security Officer (CCISO)
CCISO · 578 questions
Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH)
CEH · 594 questions
Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator (CHFI)
CHFI · 589 questions
Certified Cloud Security Engineer (CCSE)
CCSE · 624 questions
Certified Network Defender (CND)
CND · 562 questions
$17.99
One-time access to this exam